Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25619485›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Comparison of different equations to assess glomerular filtration in critically ill patients.

Mieke Carlier, Alexander Dumoulin, Alexander Janssen, Sven Picavet, Steve Vanthuyne, Ria Van Eynde, Raymond Vanholder, Joris Delanghe, Gert De Schoenmakere, Jan J De Waele and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Brain-kidney crosstalk in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mieke CarlierDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, mieke.carlier@ugent.be.
Alexander Dumoulin
Alexander Janssen
Sven Picavet
Steve Vanthuyne
Ria Van Eynde
Raymond Vanholder
Joris Delanghe
Gert De Schoenmakere
Jan J De Waele
Eric A J Hoste

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and measured urinary creatinine clearance, compared to measured GFR in critically ill patients.

methodsGFR was measured using inulin clearance. Multiple blood samples were collected per patient for determination of serum creatinine, cystatin C and inulin. GFR was estimated by the use of the following estimation equations (eGFR): four commonly used creatinine-based equations [Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (both the short and long formula) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)], five cystatin C based estimation equations (Hoek, Larsson, Filler, Le Bricon, CKD-EPIcys) and one equation combining cystatin C and serum creatinine (CKD-EPIcr-cys). In addition we measured urinary creatinine clearance. Bias, precision and accuracy of all estimates were compared to those of the inulin clearance.

resultsData were collected from 83 patients, of whom 68 were considered evaluable. The median age was 58 years [interquartile range (IQR) 39-68]. The median inulin clearance was 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (IQR 31-114). Equations based on creatinine had much bias and poor precision and accuracy. Measured urinary creatinine clearances overestimated GFR. Equations based on cystatin C were free of bias, but also had limited precision and accuracy.

conclusionsIn this cohort of patients, estimates of GFR had low accuracy and precision. Cystatin C based formulas, especially CKD-EPIcr-cys, showed limited bias; however, the accuracy and precision of these estimates were still insufficient. Measured urinary creatinine clearance overestimates GFR, but may provide a cheap alternative, when this is taken into account.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessGlomerular Filtration RateAdultAgedBiomarkersCreatinineCystatin CFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInulinKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBiomarkersCreatinineCystatin CInulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.