Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25619196›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2016

Patient Beliefs About Colon Cancer Screening.

John W Ely, Barcey T Levy, Jeanette Daly, Yinghui Xu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01477814 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Poor Rural Iowa Counties), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01477814 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Poor Rural Iowa Counties

TypeinterventionalSponsorBarcey T. LevyRan2008 to 2015Enrolled743ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsPhysician chart reminder, chart reminder, educational mat'ls, FIT, CR,ed mat'ls, FIT, phone call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John W ElyDepartment of Family Medicine, Joy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. john-ely@uiowa.edu.
Barcey T LevyDepartment of Family Medicine, Joy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jeanette DalyDepartment of Family Medicine, Joy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Yinghui XuDepartment of Family Medicine, Joy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer ImmunologyP30CA030199 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI ELENA B PASQUALE · 1985 to 2026
$107.2M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardU54TR001356 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2016
$7.1M
Enhancing Community-based Cancer Control in IowaRC4CA153493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LEVY, BARCEY THURSTON · 2010 to 2010
$1.0M
AHRQ HHS R21 HS014490NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001356NCI NIH HHS P30 CA030199NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS RC4 CA153493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only about half of eligible individuals undergo colon cancer screening. We have limited knowledge about the patient beliefs that adversely affect screening decisions and about which beliefs might be amenable to change through education. As part of a clinical trial, 641 rural Iowans, aged 52 to 79 years, reported their beliefs about colon cancer screening in response to a mailed questionnaire. Consenting subjects were randomized into four groups, which were distinguished by four levels of increasingly intensive efforts to promote screening. Two of the groups received mailed educational materials and completed a follow-up questionnaire, which allowed us to determine whether their beliefs about screening changed following the education. We also completed a factor analysis to identify underlying (latent) factors that might explain the responses to 33 questions about readiness, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to colon cancer screening. The strongest predictors of a patient's stated readiness to be screened were a physician's recommendation to be screened (1 point difference on 10-point Likert scale, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.6 point difference), a family history of colon cancer (0.85-point Likert scale difference, 95 % CI, 0.1 to 1.6), and a belief that health-care decisions should be mostly left to physicians rather than patients (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.21, P < .001). Of the 33 questionnaire items about screening beliefs, 11 (33 %) changed favorably following the educational intervention. In the factor analysis, the 33 items were reduced to 8 underlying factors, such as being too busy to undergo screening and worries about screening procedures. We found a limited number of underlying factors that may help explain patient resistance to colon cancer screening.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicAgedColonic NeoplasmsCultureEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisColorectal neoplasmsFactor analysisHealth behavior

Identifiers

PMID25619196
PMCPMC7712459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.