Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25618479›Full record

ReviewPathology oncology research : POR2015

Pathology of gallbladder carcinoma: current understanding and new perspectives.

Munita Meenu Bal, Mukta Ramadwar, Kedar Deodhar, Shailesh Shrikhande

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic parameters of pretreatment 2-[Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Routine Histopathological Examination of the Specimen After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Can We Be Brave Enough to Give Up?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Munita Meenu BalDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India, munitamenon@gmail.com.
Mukta Ramadwar
Kedar Deodhar
Shailesh Shrikhande
Tata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare and highly lethal malignancy. It stands out from amongst the other GI tract malignancies for its unique epidemiological profile, proclivity for female gender, definitional ambiguities, ability to escape early diagnosis, and absence of effective treatment. Pathobiology of gallbladder carcinoma continues to remain poorly understood. Recently, better characterization of the precursor lesions and elucidation of underlying molecular pathways has enhanced our understanding of gallbladder tumorigenesis. Proposal of a unified terminology and evolving consensus in classifying gallbladder pre-invasive neoplasia offers hope of better assimilation of rare data from diverse parts of the world. Identifying biomarkers and cancer specific cellular targets that will pave the way for novel therapeutic approaches for gallbladder carcinoma is urgently needed. In this review we delve into the epidemiologic, genetic and pathologic characteristics of this enigmatic disease with a special focus on the recent advancements in the field of gallbladder pathology.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25618479
OpenAlexW1979876341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.