Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25618304›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2015

Statins and cognitive function: an updated review.

Saurav Chatterjee, Parasuram Krishnamoorthy, Pragya Ranjan, Ahana Roy, Anasua Chakraborty, Manpreet Singh Sabharwal, Richard Ro, Vikram Agarwal, Partha Sardar, Jacqueline Danik and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drug therapies for chronic conditions and risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Saurav ChatterjeeDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center of the Mount Sinai Health System, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue Clark Building, 3rd floor, New York, NY, 10025, USA, sauravchatterjeemd@gmail.com.
Parasuram Krishnamoorthy
Pragya Ranjan
Ahana Roy
Anasua Chakraborty
Manpreet Singh Sabharwal
Richard Ro
Vikram Agarwal
Partha Sardar
Jacqueline Danik
Jay S Giri
Emil M DeGoma
Dharam J Kumbhani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the USA. Statins have substantially contributed to the decline in mortality due to heart disease. Historically, statins are hypothesized to be neuroprotective and beneficial in dementia, but recent reports have suggested an association with transient cognitive decline. We have critically appraised the relationship between statins and cognitive function in this review. Most of the data are observational and reported a protective effect of statins on dementia and Alzheimer's disease in patients with normal cognition at baseline. Few studies, including two randomized control trials, were unable to find a statistically significant decrease in the risk or improvement in patients with established dementia or decline in cognitive function with statin use. As more randomized control trials are required to definitively settle this, cardiovascular benefits of statins must be weighed against the risks of cognitive decline on an individual basis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCardiovascular DiseasesCase-Control StudiesCognitionHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMyocardial IschemiaNeuroprotective AgentsOxidative StressProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.