Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25618218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2015

Clinical significance of IPF% or RP% measurement in distinguishing primary immune thrombocytopenia from aplastic thrombocytopenic disorders.

Mikiko Sakuragi, Satoru Hayashi, Miho Maruyama, Osamu Kabutomori, Tomoko Kiyokawa, Keisuke Nagamine, Hisashi Kato, Hirokazu Kashiwagi, Yuzuru Kanakura, Yoshiaki Tomiyama

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02967328 (A Multi-Center Prospective Blind Study of RP% Measurement by Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02967328 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-Center Prospective Blind Study of RP% Measurement by Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

TypeobservationalSponsorShandong UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled500ConditionsImmune ThrombocytopeniaArmsRP% Measurement by FCM as a Diagnostic Test for ITP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How we treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mikiko SakuragiDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Satoru Hayashi
Miho Maruyama
Osamu Kabutomori
Tomoko Kiyokawa
Keisuke Nagamine
Hisashi Kato
Hirokazu Kashiwagi
Yuzuru Kanakura
Yoshiaki Tomiyama

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is based on differential diagnosis. Although the measurement of percentages of reticulated platelets (RP%) by flow cytometry is useful as a supportive diagnostic test, this method is nonetheless a time-consuming, laboratory-based assay. To identify alternative assays that are useful in daily practice, we compared three methods in parallel, IPF% measured by XE-2100 [IPF% (XE), Sysmex Corp.], IPF% measured by new XN-1000 [IPF% (XN)], and RP%. We examined 47 patients with primary ITP, 28 patients with aplastic thrombocytopenia (18 aplastic anemia and 10 chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia) and 80 healthy controls. In a selected experiment, we examined 16 patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) to examine the effect of hemolysis. As compared with IPF% (XE), IPF% (XN) showed better within-run reproducibility. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ITP were 83.0 and 75.0 % for IPF% (XE), 85.1 and 89.3 % for IPF% (XN), and 93.6 and 89.3 % for RP%, respectively. Examination of PNH patients revealed that hemolysis and/or red blood cell fragments interfered with IPF% (XE) values, but not with IFP % (XN) values. Our results suggest that IPF% measured by XN-1000 may be of comparable value with RP% as a supportive diagnostic test for ITP.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PlateletsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHemoglobinuria, ParoxysmalHemolysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicThrombocytopeniaThrombopoietinThrombopoietin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.