Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25617964›Full record

ArticleComprehensive psychiatry2015

Trajectories of medication attitudes and adherence behavior change in non-adherent bipolar patients.

Jennifer B Levin, Curtis Tatsuoka, Kristin A Cassidy, Michelle E Aebi, Martha Sajatovic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comprehensive psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer B LevinDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: Jennifer.levin@uhhospitals.org.
Curtis TatsuokaNeurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Kristin A CassidyDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Michelle E AebiDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Martha SajatovicDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity School · US

Funding

Customized Treatment Adherence Enhancement in Bipolar DisorderR34MH078967 · NIMH · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SAJATOVIC, MARTHA X · 2008 to 2010
$634k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH078967NIMH NIH HHS R34MH078967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile medication treatment is necessary for the successful management of bipolar disorder (BD), non-adherence rates are up to 60%. Although medication attitudes are believed to be relevant to adherence behavior, few studies have investigated the trajectories of adherence change. This study evaluated attitudinal correlates of adherence conversion in 86 poorly adherent individuals with BD.

methodsThis secondary analysis pooled data from two uncontrolled prospective trials of customized adherence enhancement (CAE), a psychosocial intervention delivered over 4-6 weeks. Poor adherence was defined as missing at least 20% of prescribed BD medication based on the self-reported Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ). The sample was dichotomized into converters who achieved good adherence (N=44) and non-converters who remained poorly adherent (N=21). Converters vs. non-converters were compared on adherence, attitudes, and symptoms at baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months.

resultsAt baseline, converters and non-converters were similar demographically and clinically, but converters were less non-adherent (32% doses missed) than non-converters (59% missed). At 6 weeks, converters had better attitudes than non-converters. At 3 months, converters maintained improvements, but group differences were less pronounced due to some improvement in non-converters. Converters had better adherence at 3 months and trajectories differed for the groups on attitudes. Symptoms gradually improved for both converters and non-converters.

conclusionsOver two-thirds of poorly adherent BD patients who received CAE converted to good adherence. Improved medication attitudes may be a driver of improved adherence behavior and ultimately reduce BD symptoms.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAntipsychotic AgentsBehavior TherapyBipolar DisorderClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceProspective StudiesSelf ReportAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25617964
PMCPMC4369431
OpenAlexW2161453602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.