Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25617342›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2015

System facilitators and barriers to discussing older driver safety in primary care settings.

Marian E Betz, Jacqueline Jones, David B Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethical Challenges in Geriatric Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017
    Article
  10. Discussions About Driving Between Older Adults and Primary Care Providers.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marian E BetzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jacqueline JonesCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
David B CarrDivision of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science, Department of Medicine and Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Physician Screening of Older Drivers: Decision Rules for Geriatric Injury PreventK23AG043123 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BETZ, MARIAN ELIZABETH · 2013 to 2017
$915k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG043123NIA NIH HHS K23AG043123]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care physicians play a leading role in counselling older drivers, but discussions often do not occur until safety concerns arise. Prior work suggests that routine questioning about driving might facilitate these difficult conversations.

objectiveTo explore system-level factors affecting driving discussions in primary care settings, in order to inform the design and implementation of a programme supporting routine conversations.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study used iterative interviews with providers (physicians, nurses, medical assistants, social workers, and administrative staff) working at two clinics (one geriatric, one general internal medicine) at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. General inductive techniques in transcript analysis were used to identify stakeholder-perceived system-level barriers and facilitators to routine conversations with older drivers.

resultsFrom 15 interviews, four themes emerged: (1) complexity of defined provider roles within primary care setting (which can both support team work and hamper efficiency); (2) inadequate resources to support providers (including clinical prompts, local guides, and access to social workers and driving specialists); (3) gaps in education of providers and patients about discussing driving; and (4) suggested models to enhance provider conversations with older drivers (including following successful examples and using defined pathways integrated into the electronic medical record). A fifth theme was that participants characterised their experiences in terms of current and ideal states.

conclusionsPhysicians have been tasked with assessing older driver safety and guiding older patients through the process of 'driving retirement.' Attention to system-level factors such as provider roles, resources, and training can support them in this process.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSafetyAdultAgedAutomobile DrivingCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient RelationsProfessional RoleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID25617342
PMCPMC4512937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.