Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25617048›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2015

Validation of the Abdominal Pain Index using a revised scoring method.

Kelsey T Laird, Amanda L Sherman, Craig A Smith, Lynn S Walker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02565355 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Elimination Based on IgG Antibodies for Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02565355 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Elimination Based on IgG Antibodies for Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases (FGIDs) in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2015 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsFunctional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, Abdominal Pain (AP)ArmsDietary Exclusion, Standard Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelsey T LairdDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University lynn.walker@vanderbilt.edu.
Amanda L ShermanDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University.
Craig A SmithDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University.
Lynn S WalkerDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
ILLNESS BEHAVIOR AND SOMATIZATION IN CHILDRENR01HD023264 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, LYNN D. · 1987 to 2011
$3.9M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024975NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD15052NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD023264NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD23264NIDDK NIH HHS DK058404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the psychometric properties of child- and parent-report versions of the four-item Abdominal Pain Index (API) in children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and healthy controls, using a revised scoring method that facilitates comparisons of scores across samples and time.

methodsPediatric patients aged 8-18 years with FAP and controls completed the API at baseline (N = 1,967); a subset of their parents (N = 290) completed the API regarding the child's pain. Subsets of patients completed follow-up assessments at 2 weeks (N = 231), 3 months (N = 330), and 6 months (N = 107). Subsets of both patients (N = 389) and healthy controls (N = 172) completed a long-term follow-up assessment (mean age at follow-up = 20.21 years, SD = 3.75).

resultsThe API demonstrated good concurrent, discriminant, and construct validity, as well as good internal consistency.

conclusionWe conclude that the API, using the revised scoring method, is a useful, reliable, and valid measure of abdominal pain severity.

Indexed as

Physical ExaminationAbdominal PainAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleParentsPediatricsPsychometricsabdominal painchronic painpain severityparent reportpediatric pain

Identifiers

PMID25617048
PMCPMC4502391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.