Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616996›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2015

[Recommendations of the updated LONTS guidelines. Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].

W Häuser, F Bock, P Engeser, G Hege-Scheuing, M Hüppe, G Lindena, C Maier, H Norda, L Radbruch, R Sabatowski and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [How long does a long-term therapy last?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  14. [Pain management in sickle cell disease].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [Pain management in osteoporosis].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  18. [The US opioid epidemic is threatening Germany].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

W HäuserMedizinisches Versorgungszentrum (Schmerztherapie, Palliativmedizin, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie) Saarbrücken - St. Johann, Saarbrücken, Deutschland, whaeuser@klinikum-saarbruecken.de.
F Bock
P Engeser
G Hege-Scheuing
M Hüppe
G Lindena
C Maier
H Norda
L Radbruch
R Sabatowski
M Schäfer
M Schiltenwolf
M Schuler
H Sorgatz
T Tölle
A Willweber-Strumpf
F Petzke
Heidelberg University · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DECenter for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEMalteser-Krankenhaus · DERavensburg University of Cooperative Education · DETechnical University of Darmstadt · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe regular update of the German S3 guidelines on long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), the"LONTS" (AWMF registration number 145/003), began in November 2013.

methodsThe guidelines were developed by 26 scientific societies and two patient self-help organisations under the coordination of the Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft (German Pain Society). A systematic literature search in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Scopus databases (up until October 2013) was performed. Levels of evidence were assigned according to the classification system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The strength of the recommendations was established by multistep formal procedures, in order to reach a consensus according to German Association of the Medical Scientific Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlich Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften", AWMF) regulations. The guidelines were reviewed by the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association, the Austrian Pain Society and the Swiss Association for the Study of Pain.

resultsOpioids are one drug-based treatment option for short- (4-12 weeks), intermediate- (13-25 weeks) and long-term (≥ 26 weeks) therapy of chronic osteoarthritis, diabetic polyneuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia and low back pain. Contraindications are primary headaches, as well as functional somatic syndromes and mental disorders with the (cardinal) symptom pain. For all other clinical presentations, a short- and long-term therapy with opioid-containing analgesics should be evaluated on an individual basis. Long-term therapy with opioid-containing analgesics is associated with relevant risks (sexual disorders, increased mortality).

conclusionResponsible application of opioid-containing analgesics requires consideration of possible indications and contraindications, as well as regular assessment of efficacy and adverse effects. Neither an uncritical increase in opioid application, nor the global rejection of opioid-containing analgesics is justified in patients with CNCP.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainConsensusControlled Clinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGermanyHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25616996
OpenAlexW82329944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.