Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616800›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Phylogeny of intestinal ciliates, including Charonina ventriculi, and comparison of microscopy and 18S rRNA gene pyrosequencing for rumen ciliate community structure analysis.

Sandra Kittelmann, Savannah R Devente, Michelle R Kirk, Henning Seedorf, Burk A Dehority, Peter H Janssen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Symbionts of Ciliates and Ciliates as Symbionts.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Morphometric and Molecular Analysis of Five-SpineLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra KittelmannAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand sandra.kittelmann@agresearch.co.nz peter.janssen@agresearch.co.nz.
Savannah R DeventeAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Michelle R KirkAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Henning SeedorfAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Burk A DehorityDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Peter H JanssenAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand sandra.kittelmann@agresearch.co.nz peter.janssen@agresearch.co.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of high-throughput methods, such as the construction of 18S rRNA gene clone or pyrosequencing libraries, has allowed evaluation of ciliate community composition in hundreds of samples from the rumen and other intestinal habitats. However, several genera of mammalian intestinal ciliates have been described based only on morphological features and, to date, have not been identified using molecular methods. Here, we isolated single cells of one of the smallest but widely distributed intestinal ciliates, Charonina ventriculi, and sequenced its 18S rRNA gene. We verified the sequence in a full-cycle rRNA approach using fluorescence in situ hybridization and thereby assigned an 18S rRNA gene sequence to this species previously known only by its morphology. Based on its full-length 18S rRNA gene sequence, Charonina ventriculi was positioned within the phylogeny of intestinal ciliates in the subclass Trichostomatia. The taxonomic framework derived from this phylogeny was used for taxonomic assignment of trichostome ciliate 18S rRNA gene sequence data stemming from high-throughput amplicon pyrosequencing of rumen-derived DNA samples. The 18S rRNA gene-based ciliate community structure was compared to that obtained from microscopic counts using the same samples. Both methods allowed identification of dominant members of the ciliate communities and classification of the rumen ciliate community into one of the types first described by Eadie in 1962. Notably, each method is associated with advantages and disadvantages. Microscopy is a highly accurate method for evaluation of total numbers or relative abundances of different ciliate genera in a sample, while 18S rRNA gene pyrosequencing represents a valuable alternative for comparison of ciliate community structure in a large number of samples from different animals or treatment groups.

Indexed as

BiotaAnimalsCiliophoraCluster AnalysisDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalMicroscopyMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRumenSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID25616800
PMCPMC4357937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.