Trial reportDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Sexuality after radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of erectile function and patient counseling regarding their sex life].
Trial report in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of successful erectile function using intracavernosal injection in post-prostatectomy men with erectile dysfunction.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient counseling by using the IIEF to assess erectile function (EF) before and after radical prostatectomy (RPX) is only possible under limited circumstances. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) could be used in addition to the IIEF for the assessment of EF and patient preference regarding counseling for their sex life. MATERIAL AND
methodsEF was evaluated in 307 patients 3-60 months after RPX using the IIEF-EF and EHS. Questionnaires assessed sexual activity/intercourse as well as satisfaction with sex life irrespective of EF (10-point Likert scale). Patients were further asked concerning development of new sexual methods independent of erection firm enough for penetration and further wishes regarding counseling for their sex life.
resultsOf 272 patients, 82.0% underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, 30.5% (n=83; mean age: 68.1 years) had sexual intercourse and 41.9% (n=114) were sexually active. EH Scores 1-2 and 4 coincided with compatible IIEF-EF Scores 1-21, and ≥ 26, respectively. Of the patients with an EHS of 3, 55.9% had an IIEF-EF score that was notably lower. Of patients with sexual intercourse, 65.8% were satisfied with their sex life; 53.2% of sexually active patients were satisfied without sexual intercourse. Alternative methods were manual/oral stimulation, cuddling, and the use of vibrators. Patients request individually tailored, realistic counseling.
conclusionThe advantage of the EHS compared to the IIEF is that the erectile function can be assessed irrespective of sexual intercourse and sexual partner. Counseling should assist patients towards the attainment of a satisfying sex life-even without an erection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25616765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.