Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616747›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Sequential intervention with primary excision and Limberg plastic surgery procedure for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus : Results of a pilot study].

M Ardelt, Y Dittmar, H Scheuerlein, R Fahrner, F Rauchfuß, U Settmacher

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Results of the Limberg flap procedure in acute and chronic pilonidal abscesses].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ArdeltKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Deutschland, michael.ardelt@med.uni-jena.de.
Y Dittmar
H Scheuerlein
R Fahrner
F Rauchfuß
U Settmacher
Klinikum Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current German S3 guidelines recommend radical excision for pilonidal sinus disease. Furthermore, the Karydakis operation and the plastic surgery procedure according to Limberg are also recommended. Contrary to the S2 guidelines of 2008, these two plastic surgery procedures for coverage are recommended for the treatment of the first-time manifestation of this disease. Most studies on the classical Limberg plastic surgical procedure are comparative in nature and describe a simultaneous intervention from which patients with an abscess are excluded.

aimThe aim of this present study was to analyze the results of a sequential procedure including primary excision followed by a Limberg plastic surgery procedure for the treatment of acute abscesses and chronic pilonidal sinus disease. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom July 2010 to June 2013 a total of 50 patients with pilonidal sinus disease were treated at the University Hospital Jena with an initial radical excision. In accordance with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) guidelines which were valid during that time, patients were offered plastic surgery coverage for recurrence prophylaxis and in cases of recurrence a Limberg plastic surgery procedure was recommended.

resultsOf the 50 patients 22 opted for a Limberg plastic surgery procedure during the interval. The mean follow-up after the Limberg plastic surgery procedure was 20.1 months (range 2-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were no recurrences (0 %) but four major complications (18.2 %) and one minor complication (4.5 %) were observed.

conclusionThis concept can be applied in cases of acute abscess formation and in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. The patient's decision with respect to a Limberg plastic surgery procedure for recurrence prophylaxis does not have to be made immediately. In addition, the Limberg plastic surgery procedure is performed in an infection-free stage. The second inpatient stay, second surgical procedure and prolonged time off work are a disadvantage.

Indexed as

AbscessAdultCoccyxFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePilonidal SinusPilot ProjectsPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceReoperationSacrumSurgical Flaps

Identifiers

PMID25616747
OpenAlexW80616618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.