Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616746›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Perioperative CRP quantification for appendectomy: Clinically useful or a waste of money?].

M Tachezy, I Anusic, S Rothenhöfer, F Gebauer, J R Izbicki, M Bockhorn

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical ConferenceComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M TachezyKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikums Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland, mtachezy@uke.uni-hamburg.de.
I Anusic
S Rothenhöfer
F Gebauer
J R Izbicki
M Bockhorn
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppendectomy is the most frequently performed non-elective surgical procedure in general surgery. Despite the questionable benefit, inflammatory markers, such as leukocyte count and C-related protein (CRP) are often determined before and after the surgical procedure. Clinicians are not infrequently confronted with the question whether a patient can be discharged despite an increase in inflammatory laboratory parameters.

objectivesThe aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical course of patients after appendectomy and the correlation with inflammatory laboratory findings. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 969 patients underwent a surgical procedure due to clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All clinical, laboratory and histopathological data were obtained from the patient records and a quality control database. Laboratory results were correlated with clinical and histopathological data (e.g. t-test, χ (2)-test, regression analysis and ROC curves).

resultsIn patients without acute appendicitis operative trauma caused an increase in CRP up to a median of 31 mg/dl on the first postoperative day and up to 47 mg/dl on postoperative day 2. The overall morbidity was 6.2%. The strongest predictive parameter for complications was a CRP of more than 108 mg/l on the first postoperative day with an odds ratio of 16.6 (96% CI 6.4/42.8, p < 0.001, specificity 88% and sensitivity 69%). Patients with CRP values below the threshold suffered from complications in 1.1 % of cases in contrast to patients above the threshold in 16.8% of cases (p < 0.001).

conclusionA moderate postoperative elevation of CRP values is not a general contraindication for discharge; however, postoperative determination of CRP serum values after appendectomy might be an effective predictor for complications and should therefore be measured in the clinical routine.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAcute DiseaseAdultAppendicitisC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesStatistics as TopicYoung AdultC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID25616746
OpenAlexW103747391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.