Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616698›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2015

Surgical treatment of ipsilateral multi-level femoral fractures.

Christian von Rüden, Markus Tauber, Alexander Woltmann, Jan Friederichs, Simon Hackl, Volker Bühren, Christian Hierholzer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian von RüdenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. christian.vonrueden@bgu-murnau.de.
Markus TauberDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. markus.tauber@bgu-murnau.de.
Alexander WoltmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. alexander.woltmann@bgu-murnau.de.
Jan FriederichsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. jan.friederichs@bgu-murnau.de.
Simon HacklDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. simon.hackl@bgu-murnau.de.
Volker BührenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. volker.buehren@bgu-murnau.de.
Christian HierholzerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany. christian.hierholzer@bgu-murnau.de.
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcurrent ipsilateral fractures of the proximal and shaft of the femur are rare complex fracture combinations. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated clinical and radiological long-term results after operative treatment using several surgical strategies: the so-called "rendezvous" surgical technique, e.g., the combination of retrograde intramedullary nailing and dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis, or the all-in-one device technique, e.g., long cephalomedullary nail, compared with two non-overlapping implants (e.g., conventional technique).

methodsIn a 10-year-period from 2004 to 2013, we treated 65 patients with complex ipsilateral multi-level femoral fractures. Median age was 45 years (range 19-90 years). Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Four patients died during intensive care unit treatment due to multi-organ failure prior to definitive osteosynthesis. Clinical long-term outcome using the functional system of Friedman/Wyman as well as radiological outcome was evaluated 2 years after trauma (range 13-42 months).

resultsAll-in-one device was used in 36 patients, "rendezvous" technique in 9 patients, and the conventional technique in the remaining 16 patients. Two years after trauma, complete fracture healing was found in 57 out of 61 patients ("rendezvous": 9, all-in-one device: 33, conventional: 15; p-value: 0.66). There was no significant difference regarding the complication rate in the cohort groups ("rendezvous": 3, all-in-one device: 13, conventional: 5; p-value: 0.94). Using the functional assessment system of Friedman/Wyman 2 years after trauma, a good clinical result was found in 77.7% in the "rendezvous" group, in 77.8% in the all-in-one device group, and in 75% in the conventional group.

conclusionThe indication for operative stabilization of ipsilateral multi-level femoral fractures is considered an urgent and emergency procedure. Based on the successful long-term results of this study, we prefer the "rendezvous" technique with fracture stabilization from distally to proximally. Both fracture components require stable fixation. It is advisable to stabilize the shaft fracture primarily using external fixation (damage control orthopedics) and the proximal femoral fracture using early definitive internal fixation. In a second and staged operation, the external fixator is removed and the shaft fracture is stabilized using retrograde nail osteosynthesis with overlapping of the DHS and nail implants.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, MultipleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25616698
PMCPMC4335365
OpenAlexW2129681845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.