ArticleBMJ case reports2015
Deep colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a modified clip and snare method incorporating a pre-looping technique.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Clip-and-snare method with a pre-looping technique versus conventional method in the treatment of precancerous lesion and early gastric cancer: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms at "Challenging Sites" Using a Double-Balloon Endoluminal Interventional Platform: A Single-Center Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Advancing endoscopic traction techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Clinical usefulness of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in difficult-to-access submucosal layer.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Recent advances in the management of large and complex colonic polyps.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Recent Development of Techniques and Devices in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Clinical endoscopy · 2017Review
- Recent traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: an update on tools and accessories.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is more difficult to perform for colorectal cancer than for early gastric cancer. The use of traction to facilitate direct submucosal layer visualisation is promising in reducing the procedure's time and complication rate. We report a case in which deep colonic ESD was performed with a modified clip and snare method. A 57-year-old man was admitted for ESD of a laterally spreading caecal lesion 25 mm in size (classified as LST-GM) that had been found on colonoscopy. The clip and snare method was previously developed for ESD of gastric cancer; we improved on this method and applied our pre-looping technique in the deep colon. The procedure lasted 40 min and was without complications. Our pre-looping technique represents a modification of the clip and snare method, enabling its performance in the deep colon. We expect that our technique will be applicable to colorectal tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.