Trial reportBMC medical education2015
Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e-learning system.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Offline Digital Education for Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Assessment and evaluation of a serious game for teaching factual knowledge in dental education.BMC medical education · 2023Trial
- Learning through a virtual patient vs. recorded lecture: a comparison of knowledge retention in a trauma case.International journal of medical education · 2018Trial
- Review
- Article
- Design of Learner-Created Electronic Flashcards in Undergraduate Medical Education: Implications for Knowledge and Skill Development.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- The effect of using a chatbot integrated with the ARCS motivation model in physiology education: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating digital resources as a supplement to traditional anatomy teaching in dental education.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Unboxing Electronic Flashcards: An Introduction to the Design Elements of Anki for Medical Education (DEAME) Framework.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Retention of physiology knowledge among medical students in basic science: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Attitudes of an international student cohort to the Quizlet study system employed in an advanced clinical health care review course.Education and information technologies · 2023Article
- Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Support for learning under naturalistic conditions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Recall of Prior Knowledge in Medical Microbiology Among Medical Interns: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Assessment in Saudi Arabia.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Evidence of the Spacing Effect and Influences on Perceptions of Learning and Science Curricula.Cureus · 2022Review
- Comparison of the effect of two teaching methods on surgical technologist students' learning and satisfaction (flashcards vs. mobile-based learning).Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review.Medical education · 2020Article
- Online Self-testing Resources Prepared by Peer Tutors as a Formative Assessment Tool in Pharmacology Courses.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Next Dimension Medical Education: A Pilot Study Exploring Virtual Reality in Head and Neck Anatomy.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpaced-repetition and test-enhanced learning are two methodologies that boost knowledge retention. ALERT STUDENT is a platform that allows creation and distribution of Learning Objects named flashcards, and provides insight into student judgments-of-learning through a metric called 'recall accuracy'. This study aims to understand how the spaced-repetition and test-enhanced learning features provided by the platform affect recall accuracy, and to characterize the effect that students, flashcards and repetitions exert on this measurement.
methodsThree spaced laboratory sessions (s0, s1 and s2), were conducted with n=96 medical students. The intervention employed a study task, and a quiz task that consisted in mentally answering open-ended questions about each flashcard and grading recall accuracy. Students were randomized into study-quiz and quiz groups. On s0 both groups performed the quiz task. On s1 and s2, the study-quiz group performed the study task followed by the quiz task, whereas the quiz group only performed the quiz task. We measured differences in recall accuracy between groups/sessions, its variance components, and the G-coefficients for the flashcard component.
resultsAt s0 there were no differences in recall accuracy between groups. The experiment group achieved a significant increase in recall accuracy that was superior to the quiz group in s1 and s2. In the study-quiz group, increases in recall accuracy were mainly due to the session, followed by flashcard factors and student factors. In the quiz group, increases in recall accuracy were mainly accounted by flashcard factors, followed by student and session factors. The flashcard G-coefficient indicated an agreement on recall accuracy of 91% in the quiz group, and of 47% in the study-quiz group.
conclusionsRecall accuracy is an easily collectible measurement that increases the educational value of Learning Objects and open-ended questions. This metric seems to vary in a way consistent with knowledge retention, but further investigation is necessary to ascertain the nature of such relationship. Recall accuracy has educational implications to students and educators, and may contribute to deliver tailored learning experiences, assess the effectiveness of instruction, and facilitate research comparing blended-learning interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.