Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616349›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015

Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Fabio Galbusera, David Volkheimer, Sandra Reitmaier, Nikolaus Berger-Roscher, Annette Kienle, Hans-Joachim Wilke

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 211 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04086784 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages: Pedicle Screw Loosening Rate and Fusion Rate in Patients With Osteoporosis

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled90ConditionsOsteoporosis, Degenerative Disc Disease, Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Degeneration Spine
NCT04399421 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsOsteoporosis, Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical and radiological evaluation of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific 3D templates: a multicentric prospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal model predicts screw loosening at user-specified postoperative time points after single-level lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. MRI-based pedicle bone quality score: a superior predictor over vertebral bone quality score for pedicle screw loosening following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Prediction of pedicle screw fixation strength under craniocaudal cyclic load: comparison of various models trained on quantitative CT based finite element analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictive performance of CT hounsfield units and MRI vertebral bone quality score following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: which is better.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pedicle Screw Loosening After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery and an Analytical Review of Recurrent Loosening: Based on Revision Surgery Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  19. Bone density-optimized pedicle screw planning enhances mechanical stability.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio GalbuseraIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, via Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy, fabio.galbusera@grupposandonato.it.
David Volkheimer
Sandra Reitmaier
Nikolaus Berger-Roscher
Annette Kienle
Hans-Joachim Wilke
Universität Ulm · DEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiterature studies showed a very wide range of pedicle screw loosening rates after thoracolumbar stabilization, ranging from less than 1 to 15 % in non-osteoporotic patients treated with rigid systems and even higher in osteoporotic subjects or patients treated with dynamic systems. Firstly, this paper aims to investigate how much this complication is affecting the success rate of pedicle screw fixation, in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic patients, and to discuss the biomechanical reasons which may be related to the variability of the rates found in the literature. The secondary aim was to summarize and discuss the published definitions and conventions about screw loosening from a clinical and radiological point of view.

methodsNarrative literature review.

resultsScrew loosening appears to be a minor problem for fixation and fusion of healthy, non-osteoporotic bone. Pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic bone is believed to be at risk of loosening, but clinical data are actually scarce. Both expandable and augmented screws may be a viable option to reduce the risk of loosening, but clinical evidence is missing. Posterior motion-preserving implants seems to have a significant risk of screw loosening. Standardization appears to be lacking regarding the radiological assessment. Marked differences in the loosening rates found based either on planar radiography or on CT scanning were observed.

conclusionsReported loosening rates primarily depended on the protocol used for the clinical examination during follow-up and on the conventions used for the radiological assessment. Aiming to a better comparability of published data, we recommend the authors of clinical studies to describe which criteria were used to assess a loosened screw, as well as the protocol of the clinical follow-up examination. Low-dose CT should be used for the assessment of screw loosening whenever possible.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureHumansOsteoporosisPedicle ScrewsSpineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25616349
OpenAlexW2037861546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.