Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616223›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental health perspectives2015

Effects of ambient coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles and their biological constituents on systemic biomarkers: a controlled human exposure study.

Ling Liu, Bruce Urch, Raymond Poon, Mieczyslaw Szyszkowicz, Mary Speck, Diane R Gold, Amanda J Wheeler, James A Scott, Jeffrey R Brook, Peter S Thorne and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental health perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Cyclic Strain and Macrophage-Mediated Transport Govern Micron-Sized PMAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Factors by which global warming worsens allergic disease.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Importance of Punctual Monitoring to Evaluate the Health Effects of Airborne Particulate Matter.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effects of ambient particulate matter on vascular tissue: a review.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Inhaled SiOToxicology research · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Ling LiuHealthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Bruce Urch
Raymond Poon
Mieczyslaw Szyszkowicz
Mary Speck
Diane R Gold
Amanda J Wheeler
James A Scott
Jeffrey R Brook
Peter S Thorne
Frances S Silverman
Health Canada · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · USEdith Cowan University · AUEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jong Sung Kim · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbient coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles have been associated with mortality and morbidity. Few studies have compared how various particle size fractions affect systemic biomarkers.

objectivesWe examined changes of blood and urinary biomarkers following exposures to three particle sizes.

methodsFifty healthy nonsmoking volunteers, mean age of 28 years, were exposed to coarse (2.5-10 μm; mean, 213 μg/m3) and fine (0.15-2.5 μm; mean, 238 μg/m3) concentrated ambient particles (CAPs), and filtered ambient and/or medical air. Twenty-five participants were exposed to ultrafine CAP (< 0.3 μm; mean, 136 μg/m3) and filtered medical air. Exposures lasted 130 min, separated by ≥ 2 weeks. Blood/urine samples were collected preexposure and 1 hr and 21 hr postexposure to determine blood interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein (inflammation), endothelin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; vascular mediators), and malondialdehyde (lipid peroxidation); as well as urinary VEGF, 8-hydroxy-deoxy-guanosine (DNA oxidation), and malondialdehyde. Mixed-model regressions assessed pre- and postexposure differences.

resultsOne hour postexposure, for every 100-μg/m3 increase, coarse CAP was associated with increased blood VEGF (2.41 pg/mL; 95% CI: 0.41, 4.40) in models adjusted for O3, fine CAP with increased urinary malondialdehyde in single- (0.31 nmol/mg creatinine; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.60) and two-pollutant models, and ultrafine CAP with increased urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in single- (0.69 ng/mg creatinine; 95% CI: 0.09, 1.29) and two-pollutant models, lasting < 21 hr. Endotoxin was significantly associated with biomarker changes similar to those found with CAPs.

conclusionsAmbient particles with various sizes/constituents may influence systemic biomarkers differently. Endotoxin in ambient particles may contribute to vascular mediator changes and oxidative stress.

Indexed as

Particle SizeAdolescentAdultAgedAir PollutantsBiomarkersCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInflammationInhalation ExposureMaleMiddle AgedOntarioOxidative StressParticulate MatterAir PollutantsBiomarkersParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID25616223
PMCPMC4455587
OpenAlexW1967790695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.