Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616211›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

Trace amine-associated receptors: ligands, neural circuits, and behaviors.

Stephen D Liberles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Deorphanization of Olfactory Trace Amine-Associated Receptors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen D LiberlesDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: Stephen_Liberles@hms.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Olfactory circuits that control behaviorR01DC013289 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIBERLES, STEPHEN DANIEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013289NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) are G Protein-Coupled Receptors that function as vertebrate olfactory receptors. Like odorant receptors, TAARs constitute an ever-evolving sensory subsystem, with individual TAARs recognizing particular chemicals and some evoking stereotyped behaviors. Several TAARs mediate aversion or attraction towards volatile amines that include the mouse odor trimethylamine, the predator odor 2-phenylethylamine, and the death-associated odor cadaverine. TAAR-expressing sensory neurons achieve monoallelic receptor expression, use canonical olfactory signaling molecules, and target a dedicated olfactory bulb region. In mouse, TAAR4 and TAAR5 are encoded by adjacent genes and localize to adjacent glomeruli, yet mediate opposing behaviors. Future studies are needed to understand how TAAR-expressing sensory neurons engage higher-order neural circuits to encode odor valence.

Indexed as

LigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAnimalsBehaviorCadaverineHumansOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPhenethylaminesCadaverineLigandsphenethylaminePhenethylaminesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID25616211
PMCPMC4508243
OpenAlexW2062791132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.