Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25615858›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2015

Protein-ligand interactions investigated by thermal shift assays (TSA) and dual polarization interferometry (DPI).

Morten K Grøftehauge, Nelly R Hajizadeh, Marcus J Swann, Ehmke Pohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fluorescence-Based Protein Stability Monitoring-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. 1Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morten K GrøftehaugeChemistry Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
Nelly R HajizadehChemistry Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
Marcus J SwannFarfield, Biolin Scientific, 62 Wellington Road South, Stockport, Cheshire SK1 3SU, England.
Ehmke PohlChemistry Department and School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT094759AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decades, a wide range of biophysical techniques investigating protein-ligand interactions have become indispensable tools to complement high-resolution crystal structure determinations. Current approaches in solution range from high-throughput-capable methods such as thermal shift assays (TSA) to highly accurate techniques including microscale thermophoresis (MST) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) that can provide a full thermodynamic description of binding events. Surface-based methods such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and dual polarization interferometry (DPI) allow real-time measurements and can provide kinetic parameters as well as binding constants. DPI provides additional spatial information about the binding event. Here, an account is presented of new developments and recent applications of TSA and DPI connected to crystallography.

Indexed as

CalorimetryInterferometryLigandsProteinsLigandsProteinsdual polarization interferometryprotein–ligand interactionsthermal shift assays

Identifiers

PMID25615858
PMCPMC4304684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.