Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25615744›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2015

Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.

Deborah J Rhodes, Carrie B Hruska, Amy Lynn Conners, Cindy L Tortorelli, Robert W Maxwell, Katie N Jones, Alicia Y Toledano, Michael K O'Connor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00620087 (Evaluation of a Small Field of View Gamma Camera for Scintimammography in Patients With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, and Lobular Carcinoma In Situ), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00620087 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Small Field of View Gamma Camera for Scintimammography in Patients With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, and Lobular Carcinoma In Situ

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2003 to 2015Enrolled66ConditionsAtypical Lobular Hyperplasia, Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Lobular Carcinoma in SituArmsMolecular Breast Imaging, Screening Mammography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Current and future perspectives of molecular breast imaging with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Concepts in Molecular Breast Imaging.Journal of breast imaging · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Survey of Patient Experience During Molecular Breast Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Monte Carlo-derivedMedical physics · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah J Rhodes1 Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55955.
Carrie B Hruska
Amy Lynn Conners
Cindy L Tortorelli
Robert W Maxwell
Katie N Jones
Alicia Y Toledano
Michael K O'Connor
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USBiostatistical Consulting (United States) · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of supplemental screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) in women with mammographically dense breasts after system modifications to permit radiation dose reduction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 1651 asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breasts on prior mammography underwent screening mammography and adjunct MBI performed with 300-MBq (99m)Tc-sestamibi and a direct-conversion (cadmium zinc telluride) gamma camera, both interpreted independently. The cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) were determined. RESULTS. In 1585 participants with a complete reference standard, 21 were diagnosed with cancer: two detected by mammography only, 14 by MBI only, three by both modalities, and two by neither. Of 14 participants with cancers detected only by MBI, 11 had invasive disease (median size, 0.9 cm; range, 0.5-4.1 cm). Nine of 11 (82%) were node negative, and two had bilateral cancers. With the addition of MBI to mammography, the overall cancer detection rate (per 1000 screened) increased from 3.2 to 12.0 (p < 0.001) (supplemental yield 8.8). The invasive cancer detection rate increased from 1.9 to 8.8 (p < 0.001) (supplemental yield 6.9), a relative increase of 363%, while the change in DCIS detection was not statistically significant (from 1.3 to 3.2, p =0.250). For mammography alone, sensitivity was 24%; specificity, 89%; and PPV3, 25%. For the combination, sensitivity was 91% (p < 0.001); specificity, 83% (p < 0.001); and PPV3, 28% (p = 0.70). The recall rate increased from 11.0% with mammography alone to 17.6% (p < 0.001) for the combination; the biopsy rate increased from 1.3% for mammography alone to 4.2% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. When added to screening mammography, MBI performed using a radiopharmaceutical activity acceptable for screening (effective dose 2.4 mSv) yielded a supplemental cancer detection rate of 8.8 per 1000 women with mammographically dense breasts.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation Dosage99mTc-sestamibibreast cancermammographic densitymolecular breast imagingsupplemental screening

Identifiers

PMID25615744
PMCPMC4423604
OpenAlexW2137916135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.