Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25615438›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Quorum sensing-regulated chitin metabolism provides grazing resistance to Vibrio cholerae biofilms.

Shuyang Sun, Qi Xiang Martin Tay, Staffan Kjelleberg, Scott A Rice, Diane McDougald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals a key role forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuyang Sun1] Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-Innovation, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [2] Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Qi Xiang Martin TaySingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Staffan Kjelleberg1] Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-Innovation, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [2] Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [3] School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Scott A Rice1] Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [2] School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Diane McDougald1] Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-Innovation, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [2] Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [3] School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering · SGNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Association of Vibrio cholerae with chitinous surfaces of zooplankton is important for its persistence in marine environments, as it provides accessibility to nutrients and resistance to stresses. Predation by heterotrophic protists has a major impact on the survival of V. cholerae. V. cholerae forms biofilms as its main defensive strategy, and quorum sensing (QS) additionally regulates the production of antiprotozoal factors. The role of chitin and QS regulation in V. cholerae grazing resistance was investigated by exposing V. cholerae wild-type (WT) and QS mutant biofilms grown on chitin flakes to the bacteriotrophic, surface-feeding flagellate Rhynchomonas nasuta. V. cholerae formed more biofilm biomass on chitin flakes compared with nonchitinous surfaces. The growth of R. nasuta was inhibited by WT biofilms grown on chitin flakes, whereas the inhibition was attenuated in QS mutant biofilms. The chitin-dependent toxicity was also observed when the V. cholerae biofilms were developed under continuous flow or grown on a natural chitin source, the exoskeleton of Artemia. In addition, the antiprotozoal activity and ammonium concentration of V. cholerae biofilm supernatants were quantified. The ammonium levels (3.5 mM) detected in the supernatants of V. cholerae WT biofilms grown on chitin flakes were estimated to reduce the number of R. nasuta by >80% in add-back experiments, and the supernatant of QS mutant biofilms was less toxic owing to a decrease in ammonium production. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the majority of genes involved in chitin metabolism and chemotaxis were significantly downregulated in QS mutant biofilms when grown on chitin compared with the WT biofilms.

Indexed as

AmmoniaAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsBiofilmsChitinKinetoplastidaQuorum SensingVibrio choleraeZooplanktonAmmoniaAntiprotozoal AgentsChitin

Identifiers

PMID25615438
PMCPMC4511936
OpenAlexW2077752520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.