Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25614770›Full record

ArticleThe open dentistry journal2014

A comparison of shear bond strength of ceramic and resin denture teeth on different acrylic resin bases.

Massimo Corsalini, Daniela Di Venere, Francesco Pettini, Gianluca Stefanachi, Santo Catapano, Antonio Boccaccio, Luciano Lamberti, Carmine Pappalettere, Stefano Carossa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open dentistry journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo CorsaliniSchool of Dentistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Daniela Di VenereSchool of Dentistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Francesco PettiniSchool of Dentistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Gianluca StefanachiSchool of Dentistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Santo CatapanoSchool of Dentistry, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Antonio BoccaccioDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management (DMMM), Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Luciano LambertiDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management (DMMM), Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Carmine PappalettereDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management (DMMM), Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Stefano CarossaSchool of Dentistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITPolytechnic University of Bari · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of different resin bases and artificial teeth made of ceramic or acrylic resin materials and whether tooth-base interface may be treated with aluminium oxide sandblasting. Experimental measurements were carried on 80 specimens consisting of a cylinder of acrylic resin into which a single tooth is inserted. An ad hoc metallic frame was realized to measure the shear bond strength at the tooth-base interface. A complete factorial plan was designed and a three-way ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) was carried out to investigate if shear bond strength is affected by the following factors: (i) tooth material (ceramic or resin); (ii) base material (self-curing or thermal-curing resin); (iii) presence or absence of aluminium oxide sandblasting treatment at the tooth-base interface. Tukey post hoc test was also conducted to evaluate any statistically significant difference between shear strength values measured for the dif-ferently prepared samples. It was found from ANOVA that the above mentioned factors all affect shear strength. Furthermore, post hoc analysis indi-cated that there are statistically significant differences (p-value=0.000) between measured shear strength values for: (i) teeth made of ceramic material vs. teeth made of acrylic resin material; (ii) bases made of self-curing resin vs. thermal-curing resin; (iii) specimens treated with aluminium oxide sandblasting vs. untreated specimens. Shear strength values measured for acryl-ic resin teeth were on average 70% higher than those measured for ceramic teeth. The shear bond strength was maximized by preparing samples with thermal-curing resin bases and resin teeth submitted to aluminium oxide sandblasting.

Indexed as

Acrylic Resin TeethCeramic TeethResin BasesSandblastingShear Bond Strength.

Identifiers

PMID25614770
PMCPMC4298039
OpenAlexW2033682437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.