Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25614328›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015

The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Thomas P Koshy, Anand Rohatgi, Sandeep R Das, Angela L Price, Andres deLuna, Nicholas Reimold, Kyle Willett, Sharon C Reimold, Susan A Matulevicius

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low prevalence of relevant findings in inappropriate echocardiograms and discordant perceptions between cardiologists and patients.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas P KoshyDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5909 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390-9047, USA.
Anand Rohatgi
Sandeep R Das
Angela L Price
Andres deLuna
Nicholas Reimold
Kyle Willett
Sharon C Reimold
Susan A Matulevicius

Funding

UT-Southwestern Clinical and Translational Alliance for Research (UT-STAR) (TL1)UL1TR000451 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were developed to promote high-value care. We describe the prevalence of clinically significant abnormal TTE findings overall and in subgroups defined by appropriate and inappropriate AUC, and their association with clinical impact. 548 consecutive TTEs at an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed for AUC, clinical impact, and TTE abnormalities. TTE reports within 1 year of the index TTE were reviewed to determine if abnormalities were new, unchanged, or resolved. Clinical impact was classified into no change, active change, or continuation of care. 91% of TTEs were appropriate, 5% were inappropriate, and 4% were uncertain by AUC. 46% of all TTEs and 57% of first-time TTEs had no significant TTE abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of ≥1 TTE abnormality than inappropriate TTEs (56 vs. 33%, p = 0.029). Among repeat TTEs, 72 % had ≥1 TTE abnormality, however only 25% had a new abnormality. The prevalence of a new abnormality was similar between inappropriate and appropriate repeat TTEs (25 vs. 26%, p = 1.0). The prevalence of ≥1 abnormality was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change and no change in care (70 vs. 64%, p = 0.06). Although most TTEs were appropriate as defined by AUC, the majority had no significant abnormalities. Although most TTEs were appropriate by AUC, >50% of all TTEs and 25% of repeat TTEs had no significant abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of abnormalities, however the prevalence of abnormalities was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change versus no change in care.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAgedEchocardiographyFemaleGuideline AdherenceHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMedical OveruseMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Predictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.