Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25613916›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2015

I came to a fork in the DNA and there was RecG.

Piero R Bianco

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. SSB and the RecG DNA helicase: an intimate association to rescue a stalled replication fork.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piero R BiancoDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: pbianco@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Mechanistic studies of stalled DNA replication fork rescueR01GM100156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BIANCO, PIERO R, LYUBCHENKO, YURI L · 2013 to 2021
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM100156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RecG is a potent, atypical, monomeric DNA helicase. It simultaneously couples ATP hydrolysis to duplex unwinding and rewinding, and to the displacement of proteins bound to the DNA. A model is presented for the localization of the enzyme to the inner membrane via its binding to SSB. Upon fork stalling, SSB targets the enzyme to the fork where it can act. RecG displays a strong preference for processing the fork in the regression direction, that is, away from the site of damage that initially led to fork arrest. Regression is mediated by strong binding of the wedge domain to the fork arms as well as to parental duplex DNA by the helicase domains. Once RecG has regressed the fork, it will dissociate leaving the now relaxed, Holliday junction-like DNA, available for further processing by enzymes such as RuvAB.

Indexed as

DNADNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEscherichia coli ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationDNAEscherichia coli ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsRecG protein, E coliDNA helicaseRecGrecombinationSSBstalled replication fork

Identifiers

PMID25613916
PMCPMC4417463
OpenAlexW2005596792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.