Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25613747›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2015

Effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide on gastric emptying, glycaemia and insulinaemia during critical illness: a prospective, double blind, randomised, crossover study.

Palash Kar, Caroline E Cousins, Christopher E Annink, Karen L Jones, Marianne J Chapman, Juris J Meier, Michael A Nauck, Michael Horowitz, Adam M Deane

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Autonomic function, postprandial hypotension and falls in older adults at one year after critical illness.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Palash KarIntensive Care Unit, Level 4, Emergency Services Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. p_kar@hotmail.com.
Caroline E CousinsIntensive Care Unit, Level 4, Emergency Services Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. Caroline.Cousins@health.sa.gov.au.
Christopher E AnninkIntensive Care Unit, Level 4, Emergency Services Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. Chris.Annink@health.sa.gov.au.
Karen L JonesDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 6 Eleanor Harrald Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. karen.jones@adelaide.edu.au.
Marianne J ChapmanIntensive Care Unit, Level 4, Emergency Services Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. Marianne.Chapman@health.sa.gov.au.
Juris J MeierDiabetes Division, Department of Medicine I, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, Bochum, 44791, Germany. juris.meier@rub.de.
Michael A NauckDiabetes Centre, Bad Lauterberg, Kirchberg 21, Bad Lauterberg, Harz, 37431, Germany. nauck@diabeteszentrum.de.
Michael HorowitzDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 6 Eleanor Harrald Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. michael.horowitz@adelaide.edu.au.
Adam M DeaneIntensive Care Unit, Level 4, Emergency Services Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. adam.deane@adelaide.edu.au.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUDiabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInsulin is used to treat hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients but can cause hypoglycaemia, which is associated with poorer outcomes. In health glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a potent glucose-lowering peptide that does not cause hypoglycaemia. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of exogenous GIP infusion on blood glucose concentrations, glucose absorption, insulinaemia and gastric emptying in critically ill patients without known diabetes.

methodsA total of 20 ventilated patients (Median age 61 (range: 22 to 79) years, APACHE II 21.5 (17 to 26), BMI 28 (21 to 40) kg/m(2)) without known diabetes were studied on two consecutive days in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, cross-over fashion. Intravenous GIP (4 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (0.9% saline) was infused between T = -60 to 300 minutes. At T0, 100 ml of liquid nutrient (2 kcal/ml) containing 3-O-Methylglucose (3-OMG), 100 mcg of Octanoic acid and 20 MBq Tc-99 m Calcium Phytate, was administered via a nasogastric tube. Blood glucose and serum 3-OMG (an index of glucose absorption) concentrations were measured. Gastric emptying, insulin and glucagon levels and plasma GIP concentrations were also measured.

resultsWhile administration of GIP increased plasma GIP concentrations three- to four-fold (T = -60 23.9 (16.5 to 36.7) versus T = 0 84.2 (65.3 to 111.1); P <0.001) and plasma glucagon (iAUC300 4217 (1891 to 7715) versus 1232 (293 to 4545) pg/ml.300 minutes; P = 0.04), there were no effects on postprandial blood glucose (AUC300 2843 (2568 to 3338) versus 2819 (2550 to 3497) mmol/L.300 minutes; P = 0.86), gastric emptying (AUC300 15611 (10993 to 18062) versus 15660 (9694 to 22618) %.300 minutes; P = 0.61), glucose absorption (AUC300 50.6 (22.3 to 74.2) versus 64.3 (9.9 to 96.3) mmol/L.300 minutes; P = 0.62) or plasma insulin (AUC300 3945 (2280 to 6731) versus 3479 (2316 to 6081) mU/L.300 minutes; P = 0.76).

conclusionsIn contrast to its profound insulinotropic effect in health, the administration of GIP at pharmacological doses does not appear to affect glycaemia, gastric emptying, glucose absorption or insulinaemia in the critically ill patient.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000488808. Registered 3 May 2012.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastric EmptyingGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlucoseHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaInfusions, IntravenousInsulinGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID25613747
PMCPMC4340673
OpenAlexW2111849999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.