Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25613116›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Association of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with Colorectal Cancer by Subgroups in the VITamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) Study.

Xiaoliang Wang, Ulrike Peters, John D Potter, Emily White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Right Versus Left Colon Cancer: Resectable and Metastatic Disease.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoliang WangCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. xwang23@fredhutch.org.
Ulrike PetersCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
John D PotterCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Emily WhiteCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Established Investigator Award Anti-Inflammatory Exposures in Cancer PreventionK05CA154337 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2011 to 2015
$637k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA154337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is substantial evidence that use of NSAIDs reduces the risk of colorectal cancer, but no subgroup has been identified for which the chemoprevention effect outweighs the risk of side effects.

methodsWe tested the interaction between NSAID use and multiple risk factors on colorectal cancer risk in the VITAL cohort. A total of 73,458 individuals ages 50 to 76 years completed a questionnaire between 2000 and 2002, and 674 incidental colorectal cancer cases were identified through 2010.

resultsIn stratified analysis, high use of any type of NSAIDs (4+ days/week for 4+ years) was statistically significantly associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer across all subgroups stratified by sex, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, screening, and dietary factors. There was a suggestion of stronger associations among men, obese individuals, and heavier drinkers; however, none of these tests for interaction reached statistical significance. The associations were almost identical for subjects with higher overall colorectal cancer risk scores [HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.79] and those with lower risk scores (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88). Differential effects by cancer subsites and stages were tested. NSAID use was associated with a greater risk reduction of proximal colon cancer versus distal (P for difference = 0.06) and distant stage versus local (P for difference = 0.04).

conclusionThe association between high use of NSAIDs and colorectal cancer risk does not differ significantly among subgroups. IMPACT: Our results suggest that NSAIDs have a generally beneficial role in colorectal cancer prevention, largely unmodified by other exposures.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBody Mass IndexColorectal NeoplasmsExerciseFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID25613116
PMCPMC4383677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.