Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25613105›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

Gender-based Outcomes and Acceptability of a Computer-assisted Psychosocial Intervention for Substance Use Disorders.

Aimee N C Campbell, Edward V Nunes, Martina Pavlicova, Mary Hatch-Maillette, Mei-Chen Hu, Genie L Bailey, Dawn E Sugarman, Gloria M Miele, Traci Rieckmann, Kathy Shores-Wilson and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the feasibility, usability and acceptability of theDrug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Gender Perspective of Addictive Disorders.Current addiction reports · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Sex and Gender Effects in Recovery From Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Using e-technologies in clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aimee N C CampbellColumbia University Department of Psychiatry New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA; Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, 1111 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10025, USA. Electronic address: anc2002@columbia.edu.
Edward V NunesColumbia University Department of Psychiatry New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Martina PavlicovaColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health Department of Biostatistics, 722 West 168th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Mary Hatch-MailletteUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 120, Box 354805, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Mei-Chen HuColumbia University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Genie L BaileyStanley Street Treatment and Research Center and Brown University Alpert Medical School, 386 Stanley St, Fall River, MA 02720, USA.
Dawn E SugarmanHarvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and McLean Hospital Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Gloria M MieleColumbia University Department of Psychiatry New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Traci RieckmannOregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, 3181S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Kathy Shores-WilsonUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Eva TurrigianoColumbia University Department of Psychiatry New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Shelly F GreenfieldHarvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and McLean Hospital Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
Project-004UG1DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steven J Shoptaw, MADHUKAR H. TRIVEDI · 2015 to 2026
$71.6M
FLORIDA NODE OF THE DRUG ABUSE CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORKU10DA013720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI METSCH, LISA R, SZAPOCZNIK, JOSE · 2000 to 2015
$56.9M
The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013045 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 1999 to 2015
$52.6M
CU PARTNERS: NY/LONG ISLAND REGIONAL NODEU10DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI NUNES, EDWARD V., ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2001 to 2015
$47.6M
Clinical Trials Network, Ohio Valley Node U10DA013732U10DA013732 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WINHUSEN, T JOHN · 2000 to 2015
$45.0M
The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (U10)U10DA015831 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M., WEISS, ROGER D. · 2002 to 2015
$28.8M
CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK: PACIFIC NORTHWEST NODEU10DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DONOVAN, DENNIS MICHAEL, ROLL, JOHN M. · 2001 to 2015
$25.5M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS, SORENSEN, JAMES L · 2002 to 2015
$25.2M
CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK MID-ATLANTIC COLLABORATIVE GROUPU10DA013034 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P, STITZER, MAXINE L · 1999 to 2015
$25.2M
Concept ProjectU10DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2005 to 2015
$22.6M
Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA019855NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA022412NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013034NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013035NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013045NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013720NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013732NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015831NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA020024NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013034NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA020024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital technologies show promise for increasing treatment accessibility and improving quality of care, but little is known about gender differences. This secondary analysis uses data from a multi-site effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted behavioral intervention, conducted within NIDA's National Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network, to explore gender differences in intervention acceptability and treatment outcomes.

methodsMen (n=314) and women (n=192) were randomly assigned to 12-weeks of treatment-as-usual (TAU) or modified TAU+Therapeutic Education System (TES), whereby TES substituted for 2hours of TAU per week. TES is composed of 62 Web-delivered, multimedia modules, covering skills for achieving and maintaining abstinence plus prize-based incentives contingent on abstinence and treatment adherence. Outcomes were: (1) abstinence from drugs and heavy drinking in the last 4weeks of treatment, (2) retention, (3) social functioning, and (4) drug and alcohol craving. Acceptability was the mean score across five indicators (i.e., interesting, useful, novel, easy to understand, and satisfaction).

resultsGender did not moderate the effect of treatment on any outcome. Women reported higher acceptability scores at week 4 (p=.02), but no gender differences were detected at weeks 8 or 12. Acceptability was positively associated with abstinence, but only among women (p=.01).

conclusionsFindings suggest that men and women derive similar benefits from participating in a computer-assisted intervention, a promising outcome as technology-based treatments expand. Acceptability was associated with abstinence outcomes among women. Future research should explore characteristics of women who report less satisfaction with this modality of treatment and ways to improve overall acceptability.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance-Related DisordersTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAcceptabilityComputer-assisted treatmentGender differencesInternet-delivered treatmentSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID25613105
PMCPMC4414709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.