Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25612786›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2015

Water distribution in dentin matrices: bound vs. unbound water.

Kelli A Agee, Anuradha Prakki, Tariq Abu-Haimed, Ghada H Naguib, Manar Abu Nawareg, Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay, Debora L S Scheffel, Chen Chen, Seung Soon Jang, Hyea Hwang and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancing dentin bonding with catechol-based monomers by tailoring photoinitiator systems to overcome radical inhibition.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping water and monomer gradients in the adhesive/dentin interface with confocal micro-Raman imaging.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Dentin Contamination with Hemostatic Agents and Cleaning Techniques on Bonding with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  9. Compatibility versus reaction diffusion: Factors that determine the heterogeneity of polymerized adhesive networks.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Kelli A AgeeDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA.
Anuradha PrakkiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tariq Abu-HaimedFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ghada H NaguibFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Manar Abu NawaregFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Arzu Tezvergil-MutluayAdhesive Dentistry Research Group, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Debora L S ScheffelDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP-UnivEstadualPaulista, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Chen ChenDepartment of Endodontology and Oral Mucosa, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Disease, Nanjing Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Seung Soon JangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hyea HwangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Martha BrackettDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA.
Geneviéve GrégoireDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Odontology, University of Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Franklin R TayDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA.
Lorenzo BreschiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, DIBINEM, University of Bologna and IGM-CNR, Unit of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
David H PashleyDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA. Electronic address: dpashley@gru.edu.
Georgia Regents Medical Center · USKing Abdulaziz University · SAGeorgia Institute of Technology · USAugusta University · USNanjing Medical University · CNUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Reasons for poor durability of resin-dentin bondsR01DE015306 · NIDCR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI PASHLEY, DAVID H · 2004 to 2013
$4.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis work measured the amount of bound versus unbound water in completely-demineralized dentin.

methodsDentin beams prepared from extracted human teeth were completely demineralized, rinsed and dried to constant mass. They were rehydrated in 41% relative humidity (RH), while gravimetrically measuring their mass increase until the first plateau was reached at 0.064 (vacuum) or 0.116 gH2O/g dry mass (Drierite). The specimens were then exposed to 60% RH until attaining the second plateau at 0.220 (vacuum) or 0.191 gH2O/g dry mass (Drierite), and subsequently exposed to 99% RH until attaining the third plateau at 0.493 (vacuum) or 0.401 gH2O/g dry mass (Drierite).

resultsExposure of the first layer of bound water to 0% RH for 5 min produced a -0.3% loss of bound water; in the second layer of bound water it caused a -3.3% loss of bound water; in the third layer it caused a -6% loss of bound water. Immersion in 100% ethanol or acetone for 5 min produced a 2.8 and 1.9% loss of bound water from the first layer, respectively; it caused a -4 and -7% loss of bound water in the second layer, respectively; and a -17 and -23% loss of bound water in the third layer. Bound water represented 21-25% of total dentin water. Chemical dehydration of water-saturated dentin with ethanol/acetone for 1 min only removed between 25 and 35% of unbound water, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: Attempts to remove bound water by evaporation were not very successful. Chemical dehydration with 100% acetone was more successful than 100% ethanol especially the third layer of bound water. Since unbound water represents between 75 and 79% of total matrix water, the more such water can be removed, the more resin can be infiltrated.

Indexed as

AcetoneAcid Etching, DentalAdsorptionBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateDental BondingDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsDesiccationEthanolHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMolar, ThirdResin CementsSolventsTooth DemineralizationAcetoneBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateDentin-Bonding AgentsEthanolResin CementsSolventsWaterAdhesive dentistryBound waterBulk waterCollagenDentinHydrogen bonding

Identifiers

PMID25612786
PMCPMC4332395
OpenAlexW1968707321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.