ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.Updates in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Trial
- COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018Trial
- Phase II clinical experience and long-term follow-up using the next-generation single-incision platform FMX314.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- Article
- Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2024Review
- Incidence of incisional hernias and cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: a long-term follow-up cohort study of 125 patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2022Review
- Feasibility of Single-Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2020Article
- Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- A case report of a double port site hernia and their laparoscopic repair with intra corporeal suturing of the hernia necks and an underlay mesh repair.International journal of surgery case reports · 2018Article
- Incisional hernia after robotic single-site cholecystectomy: a pilot study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017Article
- Incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictive factors.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Current status and future perspective of laparoscopic surgery in hepatobiliary disease.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2016Review
- Comparing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials with cohort studies: a paradigm of single-incision laparoscopic surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016Article
- Single-incision port-site herniation: meta-analysis vs. nationwide cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016Article
- Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
- Single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory surgery setting: A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) is regarded as the gold standard for cholecystectomy. However, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) has been suggested to replace CLC. This study aimed at comparing long-term incidences of port-site hernia and chronic pain after SLC versus CLC.
methodsWe conducted a matched cohort study based on prospective data (Jan 1, 2009-June 1, 2011) from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database with perioperative information and clinical follow-up. Consecutive patients undergoing elective SLC during the study period were included and matched 1:2 with patients subjected to CLC using pre-defined criteria. Follow-up data were obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry, mailed patient questionnaires, and clinical examination. A port-site hernia was defined as a repair for a port-site hernia or clinical hernia located at one or more port sites.
resultsIn total, 699 patients were eligible and 147 patients were excluded from the analysis due to pre-defined criteria. The rate of returned questionnaires was 83%. Thus, 552 (SLC, n = 185; CLC, n = 367) patients were analyzed. The median observation time was 48 months (range 1-65) after SLC and 48 months (1-64) after CLC (P = 0.940). The total cumulated port-site hernia rate was 4 % and 6 % for SLC and CLC, respectively (P = 0.560). Incidences of moderate/severe chronic pain were 4 % and 5 % after SLC and CLC, respectively (P = 0.661).
conclusionsWe found no difference in long-term incidence of port-site hernia or chronic pain after SLC versus CLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25612547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.