Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25612545›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Targeting educational campaigns for prevention of malaria and dengue fever: an assessment in Thailand.

Macy Brusich, John Grieco, Naomi Penney, Rungarun Tisgratog, Wanapa Ritthison, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap, Nicole Achee

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Macy BrusichEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, 120 Brownson Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. mbrusich@alumni.nd.org.
John GriecoEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, 120 Brownson Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. jgrieco@nd.edu.
Naomi PenneyEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, 120 Brownson Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. npenney@nd.edu.
Rungarun TisgratogDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand. rungarun_tis@hotmail.com.
Wanapa RitthisonThe Office of Disease Prevention and Control 3 Chonburi, Vachiraprakarn Road, Bansuan, Subdistrict, MuangDstrict, Chonburi, 20000, Thailand. ritthison@hotmail.com.
Theeraphap ChareonviriyaphapDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand. faasthc@ku.ac.th.
Nicole AcheeEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, 120 Brownson Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. nachee@nd.edu.
University of Notre Dame · USKasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of at-risk populations for malaria and/or dengue fever in relation to mosquito exposure and household mosquito control practices. Specific objectives included comparison of individual and household level health practices between a rural and urban setting in Thailand. Findings are intended to guide Thailand Ministry of Health educational campaigns targeting arthropod-borne disease.

methodsA mixed method design was employed using a forced choice and open-ended questionnaire to assess KAP of participants seeking point-of-care treatment for malaria and/or dengue fever at government health-care facilities. Following informed consent, household construction characterization (percent eave gap, floor, wall, and roof material) and mosquito collections both indoors (using aspiration) and outside (using traps) were conducted at a subsample of participant homes. All mosquitoes were identified to genus and anopheline and aedine samples processed for potential pathogen infection.

resultsA total of 64 participants were recruited from both study sites; 62 categorized as malaria symptomology and 2 categorized as dengue across all study healthcare facilities. Significant associations between study site and household construction were indicated. Trends also identified household level practices and both occupation and household construction regarding type of mosquito control products purchased and the abundance of mosquitoes in sampled homes.

conclusionOverall, Ministry of Health information from education campaigns regarding malaria and dengue fever strategies is reaching the intended target populations at the study sites. Participants are aware of the presence of mosquitoes and that they serve as the potential vector for transmitting malaria and dengue fever diseases. However, specific knowledge gaps were also identified in each study site that may influence exposure to infected mosquitoes. Findings from this study are intended to guide future health education campaigns in these study settings to address specific community needs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeDengueHealth EducationHumansMalariaMosquito ControlProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic FactorsStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and QuestionnairesThailand

Identifiers

PMID25612545
PMCPMC4311424
OpenAlexW2098860465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.