Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25611401›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

The potential impact of animal protein intake on global and abdominal obesity: evidence from the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study.

Ala'a Alkerwi, Nicolas Sauvageot, Jonathan D Buckley, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Adelin Albert, Michèle Guillaume, Georgina E Crichton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diet Composition, Anthropometrics, and Mortality Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ala'a Alkerwi1Centre de Recherche Public Santé,Centre d'Etudes en Santé,1 A rue Thomas Edison,L-1445 Strassen,Luxembourg.
Nicolas Sauvageot1Centre de Recherche Public Santé,Centre d'Etudes en Santé,1 A rue Thomas Edison,L-1445 Strassen,Luxembourg.
Jonathan D Buckley2Nutritional Physiology Research Centre,University of South Australia,Adelaide,Australia.
Anne-Françoise Donneau3Département des Sciences de la Santé Publique,Université de Liège,Liège,Belgium.
Adelin Albert3Département des Sciences de la Santé Publique,Université de Liège,Liège,Belgium.
Michèle Guillaume3Département des Sciences de la Santé Publique,Université de Liège,Liège,Belgium.
Georgina E Crichton1Centre de Recherche Public Santé,Centre d'Etudes en Santé,1 A rue Thomas Edison,L-1445 Strassen,Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association of total animal protein intake and protein derived from different dietary sources (meat; fish and shellfish; eggs; milk products) with global and abdominal obesity among adults in Luxembourg.

designBinary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between animal protein intake (as a percentage of total energy intake) and global obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2)) and abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥ 88 cm for women), after controlling for potential confounders.

settingObservation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study. SUBJECTS: The study population was derived from a national cross-sectional stratified sample of 1152 individuals aged 18-69 years, recruited between November 2007 and January 2009.

resultsThere was an independent positive association between total animal protein intake and both global (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.12, 1.25) and abdominal obesity (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.08, 1.20) after adjustment for age, gender, education, smoking, physical activity and intakes of total fat, carbohydrate, fibre, and fruit and vegetables. Protein intakes from meat, fish and shellfish were positively associated with global and abdominal obesity with further adjustment for vegetal protein and other sources of animal-derived protein (all P < 0.01). Protein derived from eggs or milk products was unrelated to global or abdominal obesity.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that protein derived from animal sources, in particular from meat, fish and shellfish, may be associated with increased risk of both global and abdominal obesity among presumably healthy adults in Luxembourg. These findings suggest that lower animal protein intakes may be important for maintenance of healthy body weight.

Indexed as

Dairy ProductsEggsFeeding BehaviorMeatAdultAnimalsBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDietDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLuxembourgMaleDietary ProteinsAbdominal obesityAnimal protein intakeCardiovascular risk factorsCross-sectional studyGlobal obesity

Identifiers

PMID25611401
PMCPMC10271600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.