Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25611069›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Time-varying respiratory system elastance: a physiological model for patients who are spontaneously breathing.

Yeong Shiong Chiew, Christopher Pretty, Paul D Docherty, Bernard Lambermont, Geoffrey M Shaw, Thomas Desaive, J Geoffrey Chase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying neonatal patient effort using non-invasive model-based methods.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeong Shiong ChiewDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christopher PrettyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Paul D DochertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Bernard LambermontGIGA Cardiovascular Science, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Geoffrey M ShawDepartment of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Thomas DesaiveGIGA Cardiovascular Science, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
J Geoffrey ChaseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Liège · BEChristchurch Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory mechanics models can aid in optimising patient-specific mechanical ventilation (MV), but the applications are limited to fully sedated MV patients who have little or no spontaneously breathing efforts. This research presents a time-varying elastance (E(drs)) model that can be used in spontaneously breathing patients to determine their respiratory mechanics.

methodsA time-varying respiratory elastance model is developed with a negative elastic component (E(demand)), to describe the driving pressure generated during a patient initiated breathing cycle. Data from 22 patients who are partially mechanically ventilated using Pressure Support (PS) and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) are used to investigate the physiology relevance of the time-varying elastance model and its clinical potential. E(drs) of every breathing cycle for each patient at different ventilation modes are presented for comparison.

resultsAt the start of every breathing cycle initiated by patient, E(drs) is < 0. This negativity is attributed from the E(demand) due to a positive lung volume intake at through negative pressure in the lung compartment. The mapping of E(drs) trajectories was able to give unique information to patients' breathing variability under different ventilation modes. The area under the curve of E(drs) (AUCE(drs)) for most patients is > 25 cmH2Os/l and thus can be used as an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity indicator.

conclusionThe E(drs) model captures unique dynamic respiratory mechanics for spontaneously breathing patients with respiratory failure. The model is fully general and is applicable to both fully controlled and partially assisted MV modes.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, BiologicalRespiratory MechanicsHumansRespiratory Distress SyndromeTime

Identifiers

PMID25611069
PMCPMC4303416
OpenAlexW2153745341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.