Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610845›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2015

Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Branko Skovrlj, Jeffrey Gilligan, Holt S Cutler, Sheeraz A Qureshi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956664 (Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956664 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorÇankırı Karatekin UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsIntervertebral Disc Displacement, Low Back Pain, RadiculopathyArmsConventional Physiotherapy, Aerobic Exercise Programme, Core-Stabilization Exercise Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Minimally invasive approaches to intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Risk factors for poor functional outcomes at one year in biportal endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Branko SkovrljBranko Skovrlj, Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Jeffrey GilliganBranko Skovrlj, Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Holt S CutlerBranko Skovrlj, Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Sheeraz A QureshiBranko Skovrlj, Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western world. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease has historically been approached by way of open surgical procedures aimed at decompressing and/or stabilizing the lumbar spine. Advances in technology and surgical instrumentation have led to minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed and increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to the traditional open spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques require smaller incisions and decrease approach-related morbidity by avoiding muscle crush injury by self-retaining retractors, preventing the disruption of tendon attachment sites of important muscles at the spinous processes, using known anatomic neurovascular and muscle planes, and minimizing collateral soft-tissue injury by limiting the width of the surgical corridor. The theoretical benefits of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open surgery include reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and narcotics use, shorter hospital length of stay, faster recover and quicker return to work and normal activity. This paper describes the different minimally invasive techniques that are currently available for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

Indexed as

DecompressionDegenerative diseaseIndirect decompression techniquesInterbody fusionLumbar spineMinimally invasive surgeryPosterolateral fusionSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID25610845
PMCPMC4295214
OpenAlexW2014595248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.