Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610804›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2014

Coronary CTA using scout-based automated tube potential and current selection algorithm, with breast displacement results in lower radiation exposure in females compared to males.

Harshna Vadvala, Phillip Kim, Thomas Mayrhofer, Oleg Pianykh, Mannudeep Kalra, Udo Hoffmann, Brian Ghoshhajra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harshna VadvalaDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Phillip KimDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Thomas MayrhoferDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Oleg PianykhDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Mannudeep KalraDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Udo HoffmannDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Brian GhoshhajraDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Cardiovascular Imaging in Ischemic Heart DiseaseK24HL113128 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2012 to 2020
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL113128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of automatic tube potential selection and automatic exposure control combined with female breast displacement during coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on radiation exposure in women versus men of the same body size. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive clinical exams between January 2012 and July 2013 at an academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed. All examinations were performed using ECG-gating, automated tube potential, and tube current selection algorithm (APS-AEC) with breast displacement in females. Cohorts were stratified by sex and standard World Health Organization body mass index (BMI) ranges. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) median effective dose (ED), and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) were recorded. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of gender on radiation exposure per BMI.

resultsA total of 726 exams were included, 343 (47%) were females; mean BMI was similar by gender (28.6±6.9 kg/m(2) females vs. 29.2±6.3 kg/m(2) males; P=0.168). Median ED was 2.3 mSv (1.4-5.2) for females and 3.6 (2.5-5.9) for males (P<0.001). Females were exposed to less radiation by a difference in median ED of -1.3 mSv, CTDIvol -4.1 mGy, and SSDE -6.8 mGy (all P<0.001). After adjusting for BMI, patient characteristics, and gating mode, females exposure was lower by a median ED of -0.7 mSv, CTDIvol -2.3 mGy, and SSDE -3.15 mGy, respectively (all P<0.01).

conclusionsWe observed a difference in radiation exposure to patients undergoing CCTA with the combined use of AEC-APS and breast displacement in female patients as compared to their BMI-matched male counterparts, with female patients receiving one third less exposure.

Indexed as

breast displacementCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)femaleradiation exposure

Identifiers

PMID25610804
PMCPMC4278037
OpenAlexW1820886244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.