Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610773›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Fusion analysis of first episode depression: where brain shape deformations meet local composition of tissue.

Mahdi Ramezani, Purang Abolmaesumi, Amir Tahmasebi, Rachael Bosma, Ryan Tong, Tom Hollenstein, Kate Harkness, Ingrid Johnsrude

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nonlinear analysis of EEG complexity in episode and remission phase of recurrent depression.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mahdi RamezaniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Purang AbolmaesumiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Amir TahmasebiPhilips Research North America, 345 Scarborough Rd., Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA.
Rachael BosmaDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada ; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ryan TongDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Tom HollensteinDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada ; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Kate HarknessDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada ; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ingrid JohnsrudeDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada ; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada ; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre for Hearing and Deafness, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAIPS Research (United States) · USLinköping University · SE

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-79320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational neuroanatomical techniques that are used to evaluate the structural correlates of disorders in the brain typically measure regional differences in gray matter or white matter, or measure regional differences in the deformation fields required to warp individual datasets to a standard space. Our aim in this study was to combine measurements of regional tissue composition and of deformations in order to characterize a particular brain disorder (here, major depressive disorder). We use structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data from young adults in a first episode of depression, and from an age- and sex-matched group of non-depressed individuals, and create population gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) tissue average templates using DARTEL groupwise registration. We obtained GM and WM tissue maps in the template space, along with the deformation fields required to co-register the DARTEL template and the GM and WM maps in the population. These three features, reflecting tissue composition and shape of the brain, were used within a joint independent-components analysis (jICA) to extract spatially independent joint sources and their corresponding modulation profiles. Coefficients of the modulation profiles were used to capture differences between depressed and non-depressed groups. The combination of hippocampal shape deformations and local composition of tissue (but neither shape nor local composition of tissue alone) was shown to discriminate reliably between individuals in a first episode of depression and healthy controls, suggesting that brain structural differences between depressed and non-depressed individuals do not simply reflect chronicity of the disorder but are there from the very outset.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainDepressionFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultBrain local composition of tissueBrain shape deformationsDepressionJoint analysisStructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID25610773
PMCPMC4299971
OpenAlexW1993326000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.