Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610767›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Individual differences in symptom severity and behavior predict neural activation during face processing in adolescents with autism.

K Suzanne Scherf, Daniel Elbich, Nancy Minshew, Marlene Behrmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Face perception and learning in autism spectrum disorders.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K Suzanne ScherfDept of Psychology, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA 16802, USA ; Social Science Research Institute, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Daniel ElbichDept of Psychology, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Nancy MinshewDept. of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, USA ; Dept. of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, USA.
Marlene BehrmannDept of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon Univ., USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USCarnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

SENSORY, MOTOR, AND EXECUTIVE DEFICITS IN AUTISMU19HD035469 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MINSHEW, NANCY J · 2002 to 2006
$8.6M
NEUROBIOLOGIC AND COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF AUTISMP01HD035469 · NICHD · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI MINSHEW, NANCY J · 1997 to 2001
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P01/U19 HD35469-07NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD035469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the impressive literature describing atypical neural activation in visuoperceptual face processing regions in autism, almost nothing is known about whether these perturbations extend to more affective regions in the circuitry and whether they bear any relationship to symptom severity or atypical behavior. Using fMRI, we compared face-, object-, and house-related activation in adolescent males with high-functioning autism (HFA) and typically developing (TD) matched controls. HFA adolescents exhibited hypo-activation throughout the core visuoperceptual regions, particularly in the right hemisphere, as well as in some of the affective/motivational face-processing regions, including the posterior cingulate cortex and right anterior temporal lobe. Conclusions about the relative hyper- or hypo-activation of the amygdala depended on the nature of the contrast that was used to define the activation. Individual differences in symptom severity predicted the magnitude of face activation, particularly in the right fusiform gyrus. Also, among the HFA adolescents, face recognition performance predicted the magnitude of face activation in the right anterior temporal lobe, a region that supports face individuation in TD adults. Our findings reveal a systematic relation between the magnitude of neural dysfunction, severity of autism symptoms, and variation in face recognition behavior in adolescents with autism. In so doing, we uncover brain-behavior relations that underlie one of the most prominent social deficits in autism and help resolve discrepancies in the literature.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdolescentAutistic DisorderBrainChildHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualAmygdalaBOLD, blood oxygen level dependentDevelopmentFace recognitionfMRIfMRI, functional magnetic iresonance magingFusiform gyrusHFA, high functioning autismIndividual differencesTD, typical developing

Identifiers

PMID25610767
PMCPMC4299957
OpenAlexW1966367079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.