Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610631›Full record

ReviewIUCrJ2015

Macromolecular ab initio phasing enforcing secondary and tertiary structure.

Claudia Millán, Massimo Sammito, Isabel Usón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUCrJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ARCIMBOLDO at low resolution: Verification for coiled coils and globular proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  2. AlphaFold two years on: Validation and impact.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. The molecular architecture ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Modes and model building in SHELXE.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of applied crystallography · 2023
    Article
  7. Molecular Mechanism of STIL Coiled-Coil Domain Oligomerization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Predicted models and CCP4.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  9. The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Fragment-BasedACS bio & med chem Au · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Verification: model-free phasing with enhanced predicted models in ARCIMBOLDO_SHREDDER.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ALIXE: a phase-combination tool for fragment-based molecular replacement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia MillánStructural Biology, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona , Baldiri Reixac 15, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Massimo SammitoStructural Biology, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona , Baldiri Reixac 15, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Isabel UsónStructural Biology, ICREA at IBMB-CSIC , Baldiri Reixac 13-15, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ab initio phasing of macromolecular structures, from the native intensities alone with no experimental phase information or previous particular structural knowledge, has been the object of a long quest, limited by two main barriers: structure size and resolution of the data. Current approaches to extend the scope of ab initio phasing include use of the Patterson function, density modification and data extrapolation. The authors' approach relies on the combination of locating model fragments such as polyalanine α-helices with the program PHASER and density modification with the program SHELXE. Given the difficulties in discriminating correct small substructures, many putative groups of fragments have to be tested in parallel; thus calculations are performed in a grid or supercomputer. The method has been named after the Italian painter Arcimboldo, who used to compose portraits out of fruit and vegetables. With ARCIMBOLDO, most collections of fragments remain a 'still-life', but some are correct enough for density modification and main-chain tracing to reveal the protein's true portrait. Beyond α-helices, other fragments can be exploited in an analogous way: libraries of helices with modelled side chains, β-strands, predictable fragments such as DNA-binding folds or fragments selected from distant homologues up to libraries of small local folds that are used to enforce nonspecific tertiary structure; thus restoring the ab initio nature of the method. Using these methods, a number of unknown macromolecules with a few thousand atoms and resolutions around 2 Å have been solved. In the 2014 release, use of the program has been simplified. The software mediates the use of massive computing to automate the grid access required in difficult cases but may also run on a single multicore workstation (http://chango.ibmb.csic.es/ARCIMBOLDO_LITE) to solve straightforward cases.

Indexed as

ab initio phasingARCIMBOLDOmacromolecular structureα-helices

Identifiers

PMID25610631
PMCPMC4285884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.