ArticleComparative cytogenetics2014
A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa.
Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraspecific Karyotypic Differentiation in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Taxonomic Reassessment and Rediscovery ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative karyotype analysis of eleven species of Lilium from China using FISH with rDNA oligo-probes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Karyotype characterization and cytogenetic diversity ofComparative cytogenetics · 2026Article
- Comparative karyotype analysis provides cytogenetic evidence for the origin of sweetpotato.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024Article
- Karyotype's Rearrangement in Some Hybrids of the Orchidinae Subtribe.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies.Comparative cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Molecular cytogenetic characterization of 9 populations of four species in the genusComparative cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Karyotypes and Physical Mapping of Ribosomal DNA with Oligo-Probes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phylogenomics and integrative taxonomy reveal two new species ofPlant diversity · 2023Article
- Comparative karyotype analysis of eight Cucurbitaceae crops using fluorochrome banding and 45S rDNA-FISH.Comparative cytogenetics · 2023Article
- DCDB: Chromosome Database of Tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae): Structure, Exploitation, and Recent Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Mixed-Ploidy and Dysploidy inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Using carrot centromeric repeats to study karyotype relationships in the genus Daucus (Apiaceae).BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Genome size variation and karyotype diversity in eight taxa ofComparative cytogenetics · 2021Article
- Karyotype and genome size variation in white-floweredPhytoKeys · 2021Article
- Karyotypes of nineteen species of Asteraceae in the Hengduan Mountains and adjacent regions.Plant diversity · 2017Article
- Karyomorphometric analysis ofComparative cytogenetics · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until now, basic karyological parameters have been used in different ways by researchers to infer karyological relationships among organisms. In the present study, we propose a standardized approach to this aim, integrating six different, not redundant, parameters in a multivariate PCoA analysis. These parameters are chromosome number, basic chromosome number, total haploid chromosome length, MCA (Mean Centromeric Asymmetry), CVCL (Coefficient of Variation of Chromosome Length) and CVCI (Coefficient of Variation of Centromeric Index). The method is exemplified with the application to several plant taxa, and its significance and limits are discussed in the light of current phylogenetic knowledge of these groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.