Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610432›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014

Evolution of small prokaryotic genomes.

David J Martínez-Cano, Mariana Reyes-Prieto, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, Laila P Partida-Martínez, Amparo Latorre, Andrés Moya, Luis Delaye

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative whole-genome sequence analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David J Martínez-CanoDepartamento de Ingeniería Genética, Cinvestav Unidad Irapuato Irapuato, Mexico.
Mariana Reyes-PrietoInstitut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia Valencia, Spain.
Esperanza Martínez-RomeroCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Laila P Partida-MartínezDepartamento de Ingeniería Genética, Cinvestav Unidad Irapuato Irapuato, Mexico.
Amparo LatorreInstitut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia Valencia, Spain.
Andrés MoyaInstitut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia Valencia, Spain.
Luis DelayeDepartamento de Ingeniería Genética, Cinvestav Unidad Irapuato Irapuato, Mexico.
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXUniversitat de València · ESUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As revealed by genome sequencing, the biology of prokaryotes with reduced genomes is strikingly diverse. These include free-living prokaryotes with ∼800 genes as well as endosymbiotic bacteria with as few as ∼140 genes. Comparative genomics is revealing the evolutionary mechanisms that led to these small genomes. In the case of free-living prokaryotes, natural selection directly favored genome reduction, while in the case of endosymbiotic prokaryotes neutral processes played a more prominent role. However, new experimental data suggest that selective processes may be at operation as well for endosymbiotic prokaryotes at least during the first stages of genome reduction. Endosymbiotic prokaryotes have evolved diverse strategies for living with reduced gene sets inside a host-defined medium. These include utilization of host-encoded functions (some of them coded by genes acquired by gene transfer from the endosymbiont and/or other bacteria); metabolic complementation between co-symbionts; and forming consortiums with other bacteria within the host. Recent genome sequencing projects of intracellular mutualistic bacteria showed that previously believed universal evolutionary trends like reduced G+C content and conservation of genome synteny are not always present in highly reduced genomes. Finally, the simplified molecular machinery of some of these organisms with small genomes may be used to aid in the design of artificial minimal cells. Here we review recent genomic discoveries of the biology of prokaryotes endowed with small gene sets and discuss the evolutionary mechanisms that have been proposed to explain their peculiar nature.

Indexed as

Black Queen Hypothesisendosymbiosisminimal genome sizeMuller’s ratchetreductive genome evolutionrobustness-based selective reductionstreamlining evolutionsymbionelle

Identifiers

PMID25610432
PMCPMC4285135
OpenAlexW2120445687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.