Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2014

Cellular cardiac electrophysiology modeling with Chaste and CellML.

Jonathan Cooper, Raymond J Spiteri, Gary R Mirams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ion channel model reduction using manifold boundaries.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reproducible model development in the cardiac electrophysiology Web Lab.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A web portal for in-silico action potential predictions.Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan CooperComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Raymond J SpiteriNumerical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Gary R MiramsComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K001337/1Wellcome Trust 101222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chaste is an open-source C++ library for computational biology that has well-developed cardiac electrophysiology tissue simulation support. In this paper, we introduce the features available for performing cardiac electrophysiology action potential simulations using a wide range of models from the Physiome repository. The mathematics of the models are described in CellML, with units for all quantities. The primary idea is that the model is defined in one place (the CellML file), and all model code is auto-generated at compile or run time; it never has to be manually edited. We use ontological annotation to identify model variables describing certain biological quantities (membrane voltage, capacitance, etc.) to allow us to import any relevant CellML models into the Chaste framework in consistent units and to interact with them via consistent interfaces. This approach provides a great deal of flexibility for analysing different models of the same system. Chaste provides a wide choice of numerical methods for solving the ordinary differential equations that describe the models. Fixed-timestep explicit and implicit solvers are provided, as discussed in previous work. Here we introduce the Rush-Larsen and Generalized Rush-Larsen integration techniques, made available via symbolic manipulation of the model equations, which are automatically rearranged into the forms required by these approaches. We have also integrated the CVODE solvers, a 'gold standard' for stiff systems, and we have developed support for symbolic computation of the Jacobian matrix, yielding further increases in the performance and accuracy of CVODE. We discuss some of the technical details of this work and compare the performance of the available numerical methods. Finally, we discuss how this is generalized in our functional curation framework, which uses a domain-specific language for defining complex experiments as a basis for comparison of model behavior.

Indexed as

C++cardiacCellMLelectrophysiologyODEsimulationsoftware

Identifiers

PMID25610400
PMCPMC4285015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.