Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25610171›Full record

ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2011

Comparison of the coaxial circle circuit with the conventional circle circuit.

Ayse Mizrak, Murat Bilgi, Senem Koruk, Suleyman Ganidagli, Erkan Karatas, Unsal Oner, Rauf Gul, Levent Sahin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayse MizrakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Murat BilgiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Senem KorukDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Suleyman GanidagliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Erkan KaratasDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat (ENT), Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Unsal OnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Rauf GulDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Levent SahinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Gaziantep University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe coaxial circle system helps prevent heat loss during surgery, and it also acts as a humidifier. This study aimed to compare the coaxial breathing system and the conventional system in their ability to warm and moisturize inhaled gases, and we also analyzed lung function protection and saccharin clearance time in patients who underwent tympanomastoidectomy (TMT) with the aid of these two systems. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty adult patients of ASA physical status I-II were scheduled for elective TMT. A standard volume-dependent ventilator setting was used to establish normocapnia. The coaxial circle system was used in the treated group (n=20), whereas the conventional circuit system was used in the control group (n=20). Saccharin clearance, VC (vital capacity), FRC (functional residual capacity), FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), airway pressure, relative humidity and temperature of inspired gas, body temperature and adverse and hemodynamic effects were measured at different perioperative periods.

resultsThe relative humidity (mg H2O Lt -1) of inspired gas in the treated group was higher than in the control group at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes after anesthesia induction. The temperature of inspired gas (Centigrade) in the treated group was higher than in the control group (p<0.05) after 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 90 minutes of anesthesia. Postoperative saccharin clearance time was lower than before the operation in the treated group (p<0.05). Postoperative FRC was lower than preoperative FRC in the study and control groups (p<0.05).

conclusionThe coaxial circle system decreased postoperative saccharin clearance time and increased postoperative FRC, relative humidity and the temperature of inspired fresh gas, without any adverse perioperative effects in patients who underwent TMT.

Indexed as

Coaxial circle systemPulmonary function testsSaccharin clearance testStandard circle systemTympanomastoidectomy

Identifiers

PMID25610171
PMCPMC4261343
OpenAlexW2329584591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.