Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609857›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2015

Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

C N Chaudhari, K Tandel, N Grover, S Sen, P Bhatt, A K Sahni, A K Praharaj

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-IntermediateSultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2023
    Article
  4. Detection of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediateThe Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recent pattern of antibiotic resistance inJournal of laboratory physicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C N ChaudhariProfessor (Microbiology), INHS Asvini Colaba, Mumbai, India.
K TandelMedical Officer (Microbiology), Military Hospital Gwalior, India.
N GroverAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
S SenSenior Advisor (Pathology, Microbiology & Virology) Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt 10, India.
P BhattResident, Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
A K SahniProfessor & Head, Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
A K PraharajProfessor & Head (Microbiology), AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
Armed Forces Medical College · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INArmy Hospital Research and Referral · ININHS Asvini · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHetero-resistance vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) is phenotype, which on in-vitro susceptibility test is vancomycin susceptible (VSSA) but has a minority population of vancomycin intermediate (VISA). hVISA is responsible for vancomycin treatment failure. Population Analysis Profile- Area under Curve (PAP-AUC) is a test for detection of hVISA; however, this test is unsuitable for clinical microbiology laboratory. Tests, such as Brain Heart Infusion Agar with 6 μg/ml vancomycin (BHIA6V), E test and Macromethod E Test (MET) are available; however reported to have variable results.

methods58 clinical isolates of Methicillin resistant S aureus (MRSA) having MIC of vancomycin more than 1 μg/ml by E test and agar dilution were analyzed by PAP-AUC, BHIA6V and MET.

resultThe prevalence of hVISA was 6.9%. hVISA isolates were having vancomycin E test MIC >2 μg/ml. Sensitivity of BHIA6V, MET and E test with MIC >2 μg/ml were 0.75, 0.67 and 1.0 respectively; however, positive predictive values (PPV) were 0.43, 0.4 and 0.27 respectively with PAP-AUC. PAP-AUC ratio correlated with MIC by E test and MET.

conclusionsThere is need for screening MRSA isolates showing in-vitro vancomycin susceptibility ≤2 μg/ml by agar dilution method for detection of hVISA. PAP-AUC test is unsuitable for routine laboratory testing. BHIA6V, MET and E test can be used for screening, however have low PPV.

Indexed as

hVISAMRSAPAP-AUCVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25609857
PMCPMC4297820
OpenAlexW2100706462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.