ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational ontology framework for the synthesis of multi-level pathology reports from brain MRI scans.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Leveraging GPT-4o for Automated Extraction of Neural Projections from Scientific Literature.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Knowledge mining of brain connectivity in massive literature based on transfer learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Improved prediction of drug-induced liver injury literature using natural language processing and machine learning methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Application of Supervised Machine Learning to Extract Brain Connectivity Information from Neuroscience Research Articles.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021Article
- A Text Mining Pipeline Using Active and Deep Learning Aimed at Curating Information in Computational Neuroscience.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Automated Metadata Suggestion During Repository Submission.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Towards Differential Connectomics with NeuroVIISAS.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Construction And Analysis Of The Time-Evolving Pain-Related Brain Network Using Literature Mining.Journal of pain research · 2019Article
- Automated Neuroanatomical Relation Extraction: A Linguistically Motivated Approach with a PVT Connectivity Graph Case Study.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2016Article
- Text mining for neuroanatomy using WhiteText with an updated corpus and a new web application.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2015Article
- Automatic target validation based on neuroscientific literature mining for tractography.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationIn neuroscience, as in many other scientific domains, the primary form of knowledge dissemination is through published articles. One challenge for modern neuroinformatics is finding methods to make the knowledge from the tremendous backlog of publications accessible for search, analysis and the integration of such data into computational models. A key example of this is metascale brain connectivity, where results are not reported in a normalized repository. Instead, these experimental results are published in natural language, scattered among individual scientific publications. This lack of normalization and centralization hinders the large-scale integration of brain connectivity results. In this article, we present text-mining models to extract and aggregate brain connectivity results from 13.2 million PubMed abstracts and 630 216 full-text publications related to neuroscience. The brain regions are identified with three different named entity recognizers (NERs) and then normalized against two atlases: the Allen Brain Atlas (ABA) and the atlas from the Brain Architecture Management System (BAMS). We then use three different extractors to assess inter-region connectivity.
resultsNERs and connectivity extractors are evaluated against a manually annotated corpus. The complete in litero extraction models are also evaluated against in vivo connectivity data from ABA with an estimated precision of 78%. The resulting database contains over 4 million brain region mentions and over 100 000 (ABA) and 122 000 (BAMS) potential brain region connections. This database drastically accelerates connectivity literature review, by providing a centralized repository of connectivity data to neuroscientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.