Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609667›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Effect of study design and setting on tuberculosis clustering estimates using Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units-Variable Number Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTR): a systematic review.

Jessica Mears, Ibrahim Abubakar, Theodore Cohen, Timothy D McHugh, Pam Sonnenberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Reduced transmission of Mycobacterium africanum compared to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in urban West Africa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Clustering and recent transmission ofInfection and drug resistance · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica MearsDepartment of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Ibrahim AbubakarDepartment of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England, London, UK Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, UK.
Theodore CohenDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, USA.
Timothy D McHughDepartment of Infection, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, UK.
Pam SonnenbergDepartment of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically review the evidence for the impact of study design and setting on the interpretation of tuberculosis (TB) transmission using clustering derived from Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units-Variable Number Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTR) strain typing. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for articles published before 21st October 2014. REVIEW

methodsStudies in humans that reported the proportion of clustering of TB isolates by MIRU-VNTR were included in the analysis. Univariable meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess the influence of study design and setting on the proportion of clustering.

resultsThe search identified 27 eligible articles reporting clustering between 0% and 63%. The number of MIRU-VNTR loci typed, requiring consent to type patient isolates (as a proxy for sampling fraction), the TB incidence and the maximum cluster size explained 14%, 14%, 27% and 48% of between-study variation, respectively, and had a significant association with the proportion of clustering.

conclusionsAlthough MIRU-VNTR typing is being adopted worldwide there is a paucity of data on how study design and setting may influence estimates of clustering. We have highlighted study design variables for consideration in the design and interpretation of future studies.

Indexed as

Interspersed Repetitive SequencesMinisatellite RepeatsResearch DesignBacterial Typing TechniquesCluster AnalysisHumansMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthReproducibility of ResultsTuberculosisEPIDEMIOLOGYMOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25609667
PMCPMC4305070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.