Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609644›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Synaptic consolidation: from synapses to behavioral modeling.

Lorric Ziegler, Friedemann Zenke, David B Kastner, Wulfram Gerstner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neurobiological Causal Models of Language Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Hebbian plasticity requires compensatory processes on multiple timescales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Integrating Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity: the current state of the field and future research directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorric ZieglerSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-3956
Friedemann ZenkeSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-644X
David B KastnerSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-425X
Wulfram GerstnerSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland wulfram.gerstner@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4344-2189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity, a key process for memory formation, manifests itself across different time scales ranging from a few seconds for plasticity induction up to hours or even years for consolidation and memory retention. We developed a three-layered model of synaptic consolidation that accounts for data across a large range of experimental conditions. Consolidation occurs in the model through the interaction of the synaptic efficacy with a scaffolding variable by a read-write process mediated by a tagging-related variable. Plasticity-inducing stimuli modify the efficacy, but the state of tag and scaffold can only change if a write protection mechanism is overcome. Our model makes a link from depotentiation protocols in vitro to behavioral results regarding the influence of novelty on inhibitory avoidance memory in rats.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapsesconsolidationmodelingsynaptic tagging

Identifiers

PMID25609644
PMCPMC6605543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.