Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609622›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Role of parafacial nuclei in control of breathing in adult rats.

Robert T R Huckstepp, Kathryn P Cardoza, Lauren E Henderson, Jack L Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Neural bases for the genesis and COFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Central respiratory chemoreception.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert T R HucksteppDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763.
Kathryn P CardozaDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763.
Lauren E HendersonDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763.
Jack L FeldmanDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763 feldman@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-9412
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Generation of Respiratory RhythmR01HL070029 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FELDMAN, JACK L · 2003 to 2016
$5.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contiguous brain regions associated with a given behavior are increasingly being divided into subregions associated with distinct aspects of that behavior. Using recently developed neuronal hyperpolarizing technologies, we functionally dissect the parafacial region in the medulla, which contains key elements of the central pattern generator for breathing that are important in central CO2-chemoreception and for gating active expiration. By transfecting different populations of neighboring neurons with allatostatin or HM4D Gi/o-coupled receptors, we analyzed the effect of their hyperpolarization on respiration in spontaneously breathing vagotomized urethane-anesthetized rats. We identify two functionally separate parafacial nuclei: ventral (pFV) and lateral (pFL). Disinhibition of the pFL with bicuculline and strychnine led to active expiration. Hyperpolarizing pFL neurons had no effect on breathing at rest, or changes in inspiratory activity induced by hypoxia and hypercapnia; however, hyperpolarizing pFL neurons attenuated active expiration when it was induced by hypercapnia, hypoxia, or disinhibition of the pFL. In contrast, hyperpolarizing pFV neurons affected breathing at rest by decreasing inspiratory-related activity, attenuating the hypoxia- and hypercapnia-induced increase in inspiratory activity, and when present, reducing expiratory-related abdominal activity. Together with previous observations, we conclude that the pFV provides a generic excitatory drive to breathe, even at rest, whereas the pFL is a conditional oscillator quiet at rest that, when activated, e.g., during exercise, drives active expiration.

Indexed as

RespirationAnimalsMedulla OblongataNeuronsRatsRespiratory Centeractive expirationcontrol of breathingexpiratory oscillatorparafacial respiratory grouprespirationretrotrapezoid nucleus

Identifiers

PMID25609622
PMCPMC4300318
OpenAlexW2160515881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.