Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609611›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Sex-dependent dissociation between emotional appraisal and memory: a large-scale behavioral and fMRI study.

Klara Spalek, Matthias Fastenrath, Sandra Ackermann, Bianca Auschra, David Coynel, Julia Frey, Leo Gschwind, Francina Hartmann, Nadine van der Maarel, Andreas Papassotiropoulos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Women using hormonal contraceptives show increased valence ratings and memory performance for emotional information.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex differences and the neurobiology of affective disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Klara SpalekDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.
Matthias FastenrathDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.
Sandra AckermannDivision of Molecular Neuroscience.
Bianca AuschraDivision of Molecular Neuroscience.
David CoynelDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-5807
Julia FreyDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.
Leo GschwindDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.
Francina HartmannDivision of Molecular Neuroscience.
Nadine van der MaarelDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and.
Andreas PapassotiropoulosDivision of Molecular Neuroscience, Life Sciences Training Facility, and University Psychiatric Clinics, University of Basel, 4009 Basel, Switzerland.
Dominique de QuervainDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience and University Psychiatric Clinics, University of Basel, 4009 Basel, Switzerland.
Annette MilnikDivision of Molecular Neuroscience, University Psychiatric Clinics, University of Basel, 4009 Basel, Switzerland annette.milnik@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3933-3289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive evidence indicates that women outperform men in episodic memory tasks. Furthermore, women are known to evaluate emotional stimuli as more arousing than men. Because emotional arousal typically increases episodic memory formation, the females' memory advantage might be more pronounced for emotionally arousing information than for neutral information. Here, we report behavioral data from 3398 subjects, who performed picture rating and memory tasks, and corresponding fMRI data from up to 696 subjects. We were interested in the interaction between sex and valence category on emotional appraisal, memory performances, and fMRI activity. The behavioral results showed that females evaluate in particular negative (p < 10(-16)) and positive (p = 2 × 10(-4)), but not neutral pictures, as emotionally more arousing (pinteraction < 10(-16)) than males. However, in the free recall females outperformed males not only in positive (p < 10(-16)) and negative (p < 5 × 10(-5)), but also in neutral picture recall (p < 3.4 × 10(-8)), with a particular advantage for positive pictures (pinteraction < 4.4 × 10(-10)). Importantly, females' memory advantage during free recall was absent in a recognition setting. We identified activation differences in fMRI, which corresponded to the females' stronger appraisal of especially negative pictures, but no activation differences that reflected the interaction effect in the free recall memory task. In conclusion, females' valence-category-specific memory advantage is only observed in a free recall, but not a recognition setting and does not depend on females' higher emotional appraisal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArousalBrainEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMental RecallRecognition, PsychologySex CharacteristicsYoung Adultarousalepisodic memorypicture tasksex differencesvalence

Identifiers

PMID25609611
PMCPMC6605541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.