Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609572›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

Break-seq reveals hydroxyurea-induced chromosome fragility as a result of unscheduled conflict between DNA replication and transcription.

Elizabeth A Hoffman, Andrew McCulley, Brian Haarer, Remigiusz Arnak, Wenyi Feng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The yeast Dbf4 ZnCurrent genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Genome-wide mapping of genomic DNA damage: methods and implications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth A HoffmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Andrew McCulleyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Brian HaarerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Remigiusz ArnakDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Wenyi FengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA fengw@upstate.edu.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Single Stranded DNA: The Genome's Achilles HeelR00GM081378 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI FENG, WENYI · 2011 to 2013
$658k
NIGMS NIH HHS 4R00GM08137804NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM081378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication, checkpoint inactivation via a mec1 mutation leads to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing single-stranded DNA gaps have equal probability of producing double-strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with next generation sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed a greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of those transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. We further propose that replication inhibitors can induce unscheduled encounters between replication and transcription and give rise to distinct patterns of chromosome fragile sites.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingTranscription, GeneticCell CycleChromosome BreakageChromosome FragilityGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalHydroxyureaIonsMembrane Transport ProteinsMetalsReplication OriginStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsHydroxyureaIonsMembrane Transport ProteinsMetalsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25609572
PMCPMC4352882
OpenAlexW2133123145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.