Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609519›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2015

Approach to caring for developmentally disabled adults in the community: medical, ethical, and legal considerations.

W E Osmun, Nelson Chan, Robert Solomon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Do people with disabilities have difficulty finding a family physician?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W E OsmunAssociate Professor at the University of Western Ontario and a family physician practising in Mount Brydges, Ont, and Strathroy, Ont. wosmun@uwo.ca.
Nelson ChanAssistant Professor at the University of Western Ontario and a family physician practising in London, Ont, and Exeter, Ont.
Robert SolomonDistinguished Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Western Ontario in London.
Western University · CACollege of Family Physicians of Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the medical, ethical, and legal obligations in caring for adults with developmental disabilities (DDs) living in the community. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Google and MEDLINE searches were conducted using the terms disabled, disability, vulnerable, and community. The pertinent legislation was reviewed. MAIN MESSAGE: The treatment of a patient with DDs varies with factors such as the pathogenesis of the patient's current problem, comorbid conditions, the severity of his or her disabilities, and his or her current social supports. While the shift from institutional to community care for patients with DDs is widely accepted as being beneficial, providing high-quality community care has proven to be challenging. However, there is little research on how to effectively provide community support to adults with DDs. As primary care providers, family physicians are often the first point of contact for patients, and are responsible for both the coordination and the continuity of care. With the movement toward preventive care and early disease detection, the patient's active participation is also vital. The patient's values and goals are an essential consideration, even when they are contrary to the patient's good health or the clinician's own values. The legislation for vulnerable persons varies among the provinces. Thus, the obligation to report suspected abuse might depend on whether the vulnerable person is living in a care facility or the community; whether the person with the suspicion is a service provider or health care professional; and whether the specific circumstances fall within the legislative definition of abuse or neglect.

conclusionPrimary care providers must give adults with DDs compassionate care that respects the patients' wishes.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesAdultCanadaCommunity Health ServicesHealth Services for Persons with DisabilitiesHumansPersons with DisabilitiesSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID25609519
PMCPMC4301760
OpenAlexW25609519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.